Teams

Wyoming/Merigliano/55&Over8.0W

2024 USTA 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-19vs Laramie Passing ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheri Witz / Linda Merigliano vs Ellen Laubhan / Nancy Peck3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKay Modi / Sallie Felton vs Sharon Buccino / Sheri Foster0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMimi Freymann / Kristina Peterson vs Megan Hayes / Alyson Hagy6-4, 6-3
2024-05-18vs Laramie Passing ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheri Witz / Linda Merigliano vs Megan Hayes / Nancy Peck6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKay Modi / Kristina Peterson vs Alyson Hagy / Sharon Buccino2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane McGee / Mimi Freymann vs Linda Miller / Sheri Foster6-4, 6-4
2024-05-18vs Laramie Passing ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheri Witz / Linda Merigliano vs Sharon Buccino / Alyson Hagy6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristina Peterson / Sallie Felton vs Nancy Peck / Ellen Laubhan2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDiane McGee / Mimi Freymann vs Megan Hayes / Linda Miller6-4, 6-3
2024-05-17vs Laramie Passing ShotsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheri Witz / Linda Merigliano vs Alyson Hagy / Sharon Buccino2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane McGee / Kay Modi vs Nancy Peck / Ellen Laubhan4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristina Peterson / Sallie Felton vs Megan Hayes / Sheri Foster3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Merigliano/55&Over8.0W227513118
2Laramie Passing Shots225716113

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Mimi Freymann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Cheri Witz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Linda Merigliano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Diane McGee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Kristina Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Sallie Felton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kay Modi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Peterson + Sallie Felton1442% gamesnot enough data
Diane McGee + Mimi Freymann314 matchesnot enough data
Kay Modi + Linda Merigliano213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mimi Freymann
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Cheri Witz
30W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Linda Merigliano
49W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Diane McGee
7W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
Kristina Peterson
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.35
Sallie Felton
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.21
Kay Modi
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.