Teams

Sebring Summer '21

2021 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-29vs Longshots 40+ Summer 21Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam Hobbs / Sean Zindren vs Michael Long / Jason Muhl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-08vs Craig/LassowWon 10
W#1 DoublesKenneth Gutzman / Sam Hobbs vs Jeff Craig / Aloisio Lovo6-3, 6-1
2021-06-17vs Goodman- Summer Swillers 21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSam Hobbs / Javier de Ana vs David Goodman / John Reichling7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-03vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine Summer 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesSean Zindren / Sam Hobbs vs Reed Krider / Dave Combs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesSam Hobbs / Eric Ziegler vs Michael Torres / Robert Jensen6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Sam Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Kenneth Gutzman
published
3.82
Pablo Levi
published
3.79
Mark Matijasevich
published
3.78
Matt Bartell
published
3.75
Tony Mosser
published
3.74
Daniel Sebring
published 4
3.60
Eric Ziegler
published 4
3.52
Scott Emmons
published
Javier de Ana
published
Klenton Willis
published
Mark Peschel
published
Peter Puster
published
Sean Zindren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pablo Levi + Klenton Willis224 matchesnot enough data
Sean Zindren + Klenton Willis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sam Hobbs
249W–170L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kenneth Gutzman
14W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
Pablo Levi
13W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
Mark Matijasevich
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Matt Bartell
67W–80L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Tony Mosser
10W–31L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Daniel Sebring
6W–15L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Eric Ziegler
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Scott Emmons
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
Javier de Ana
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Klenton Willis
18W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Peschel
3W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Puster
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sean Zindren
9W–20L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.