Teams

LLW-CV-Mission Hills CC/A Tennyson

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#2 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Sanae Chance vs Tammy Roach / Jennifer Ruddell5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Moskowitz / Marta Mykytyn-Hill vs Julee Moore / Holly Simmons5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Gianna Riley
published
Catherine Lind
published 4
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
3.28
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.20
Barbara Holmsten
published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Morton
published 4
3.15
Shelley Lynch
published
2.99
Linda Moskowitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Susskind
published
Marta Mykytyn-Hill
published
Michele Weddle
published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Sanae Chance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Holmsten + Lesley Gagnon3745% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gianna Riley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Catherine Lind
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ann Tennyson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Lesley Gagnon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Holmsten
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
4
Carrie Morton
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.16
Shelley Lynch
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Linda Moskowitz
39W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Laura Susskind
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marta Mykytyn-Hill
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sanae Chance
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.