Teams

Crisis Averted

2026 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-22vs Mid Court CrisisWon 40
W#1 DoublesDean Takebayashi / Jeffery Kam vs Jonathan Aronce / Lance Kaneshiro6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDuane Sleightholm vs Nolan Yamaki6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMark Chun / Glenn Tada vs Jon Tokuuke / Dave Okamura6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Long / Grant Nishida vs Brian Koge / J Yoshimoto6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-08vs Deans GuysWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeffery Kam / Glenn Tada vs Yarett Rosario / Lawrence Heintz6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDuane Sleightholm vs Reginald Leite6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Adam Long vs Thomas Belcher / Ted Hong7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Mac Rivera vs Kelvin Nishiura / Dale Hayashi6-0, 6-1
2026-02-07vs Mid Court CrisisWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeffery Kam / Barney Frazier vs Lance Kaneshiro / J Yoshimoto6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSatoshi Tanaka vs Ty de Silva5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Mac Rivera vs Jon Tokuuke / Jonathan Aronce6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMark Chun / Dean Takebayashi vs Nolan Yamaki / Brian Koge6-3, 6-3
2026-02-04vs Deans GuysWon 30
W#1 DoublesSatoshi Tanaka / Duane Sleightholm vs RYAN OKAMURA / Thomas Belcher6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Mac Rivera vs Michael Marshall / Lawrence Heintz6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Glenn Tada vs Lester Oshiro / Ted Hong6-4, 6-0
2026-01-25vs Deans GuysWon 21
W#1 DoublesSatoshi Tanaka / Mac Rivera vs Yarett Rosario / Dale Hayashi6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKeith Kunimoto / Barney Frazier vs Riley Ceria / RYAN OKAMURA7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Grant Nishida vs Lester Oshiro / Ted Hong6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs Mid Court CrisisWon 31
W#1 DoublesDean Takebayashi / Satoshi Tanaka vs Brian Koge / Lance Sewake6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDuane Sleightholm vs Nolan Yamaki6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Chun / Grant Nishida vs Jonathan Aronce / Lance Kaneshiro4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesGlenn Tada / David Fuselier vs Jon Tokuuke / Dave Okamura6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jeffery Kam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Satoshi Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.50
Duane Sleightholm
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Mac Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Glenn Tada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Keith Kunimoto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Barney Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
David Fuselier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Dean Takebayashi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Adam Long
published 3.5
3.24
Mark Chun
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Grant Nishida
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffery Kam + Barney Frazier7263% games+11.9% vs expected
Keith Kunimoto + Dean Takebayashi6261% games+5.0% vs expected
Keith Kunimoto + Glenn Tada6360% games+4.5% vs expected
Keith Kunimoto + Mac Rivera4750% games−5.1% vs expected
Dean Takebayashi + Glenn Tada21140% games−7.0% vs expected
David Fuselier + Glenn Tada6078% gamesnot enough data
Keith Kunimoto + Mark Chun4155% gamesnot enough data
Keith Kunimoto + Satoshi Tanaka404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeffery Kam
148W–117L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.64
Satoshi Tanaka
44W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
Duane Sleightholm
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Mac Rivera
90W–82L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Glenn Tada
94W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Keith Kunimoto
149W–86L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Barney Frazier
49W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
David Fuselier
38W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Dean Takebayashi
126W–142L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Adam Long
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Chun
42W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Grant Nishida
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.