Teams

Schaefer/ Brill - River Creek

2023 Loudoun Combo Women · Loudoun Combo 7.5 W

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-31vs Kaplan/ Zimmerman- AVSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Speciale / Jacquelyn Worman vs Wendy Hopkins / Michelle Tenhaeff7-5, 6-3
2023-08-28vs Kaplan/ Zimmerman- AVSPLost 01
L#1 DoublesMoira Smith / Tara Brill vs Darla Butler / Lisa Zimmerman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-21vs Kaplan/ Zimmerman- AVSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Coleman / Tara Brill vs Kate Donadoni / Michelle Tenhaeff6-2, 6-0
2023-08-17vs Kaplan/ Zimmerman- AVSPWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mitchell / Tara Brill vs Erin Kaplan / Lisa Zimmerman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Combo 7.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Jessica Coleman
published
3.80
Lee O'Connor
published
3.80
Susan Speciale
published
3.70
Tara Brill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Wendy Massarelli
published 4
3.65
Jacquelyn Worman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Melissa Carruthers
published
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.36
Tina Le
published
3.17
Coni Schaefer
published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Moffett
published
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Moffett + Jeannie Matteson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Coleman
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
4.13
Lee O'Connor
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Susan Speciale
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Tara Brill
125W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Wendy Massarelli
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Jacquelyn Worman
137W–92L career · 1 line in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Melissa Carruthers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Tina Le
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Coni Schaefer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Lisa Moffett
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.