Teams

Hold Women #2

Hold League · Hold Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Hold Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hold Women #1000000
2Hold Women #2000000
3Hold Women #3000000
4Hold Women #4000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julie Quigley
published
3.50
Allison Newman
published 3.5
3.23
Lori Ceryak
published
3.20
Wendy McNamar
published
3.07
Ann Minnich
published 3.5
2.78
Sharae Arnold
published
2.74
Chenae Van Zee
published 3
2.60
Carla Chalfant
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Quigley
44W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Allison Newman
30W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
Lori Ceryak
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Wendy McNamar
41W–37L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ann Minnich
71W–69L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Sharae Arnold
92W–117L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Chenae Van Zee
32W–18L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Carla Chalfant
31W–37L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.