Teams

LGilchrist-CHCC

2026 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-29vs YDeaver-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Porter / Tom Porter vs Courtney Carey / Dwayne Deloatch5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKara Andrews / Nathan Andrews vs Diane Allen / FJ Magee0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLucy Leach / Buck Phillips vs Tammy Hood / Matt Carter7-5, 7-5
2026-07-22vs SGraff.40.3.0-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesAaron Meadows / Jessica Meadows vs Kristin Isaacs / Tom Luben3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhilip Gilchrist / Laurie Rechholtz vs Leslie Jackson / Jeff Russell0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Faber / Buck Phillips vs Keith Buckel / Susan Graff2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-15vs AHabib-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Porter / Tom Porter vs Karen Sonders / James Bowers1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Meadows / Aaron Meadows vs Melanie Wall / George Corbett0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Rechholtz / Nathan Andrews vs Connie Brown / Ashraf Habib3-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs JYoung.40-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Rechholtz / Nathan Andrews vs Hannah Harvey / Mark Piper4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Meadows / Kara Andrews vs Kellie Johnson / Carl Laird1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Porter / Tom Porter vs Marvin Davis / Susan Parent6-2, 6-0
2026-07-08vs NLetts-UNCLost 12
W#1 DoublesAaron Meadows / Jessica Meadows vs Lindsey Gouker / Josh Gouker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKara Andrews / Nathan Andrews vs Lisa Andrew / Tim Turner4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Leach / Tom Porter vs Mia Pizzagalli / Nathan Letts6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs TEdwards-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Porter / Laura Porter vs Tracy Stefan / Mike Kempel4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJustin Andrews / Linda Gilchrist vs Linda Nagelhout / Jeff Denhard2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Leach / Alfred Leach vs Kathy Holt / David Nagelhout2-6, 5-7
2026-06-17vs MBland-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Porter / Tom Porter vs Mark Bland / Katherine Bland2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAaron Meadows / Jessica Meadows vs Franck Seguin / Maribeth Hamilton2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKara Andrews / Justin Andrews vs CHARLES ENDERLINE / Tracy Kinsey3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-03vs JYoung.40-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlfred Leach / Kristina Vrabel vs Pamela Howell-Davis / Russell Davis0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Gilchrist / Philip Gilchrist vs Bill Schaller / Liz Schaller7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Faber / Buck Phillips vs Marvin Davis / Jonda Young3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kristina Vrabel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Jessica Meadows
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Nathan Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Laurie Rechholtz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Laura Porter
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Aaron Meadows
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Linda Gilchrist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Elizabeth Faber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Tom Porter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Buck Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Alfred Leach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Kara Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.44
Philip Gilchrist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lucy Leach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Porter + Tom Porter3249% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Meadows + Aaron Meadows314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Vrabel
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Jessica Meadows
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
Nathan Andrews
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Laurie Rechholtz
40W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Laura Porter
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Aaron Meadows
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Linda Gilchrist
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Elizabeth Faber
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Tom Porter
7W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Buck Phillips
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Alfred Leach
2W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Kara Andrews
8W–51L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Philip Gilchrist
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Justin Andrews
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucy Leach
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.