Teams

Jacelone, Marcia

2023 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Combo - Women - 55

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-06-25vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Gandy / Sara Armer vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Anne Hope6-7, 4-6
2023-06-17vs Wood, CarolWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Parrish / Mary Nogalski vs Carol Schmer / Wendy Robinson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Case / Jennifer Hill vs Susan Hoffman / Carol Tenpenny7-5, 3-5, 1-0
2023-06-10vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Armer / Mindy Stewart vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Jennifer Hill3-6, 3-6
2023-06-10vs HOA/Holsinger/55&Over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Fleming / Linda Case vs Marsha Taylor / Jacque Griffey5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Hope / Mary Nogalski vs Tracy Lockton / Renee Steffes6-7, 2-4
W#3 DoublesDixie Karnowski / Jennifer Hill vs Jody Holsinger / Julie Kehrwald6-4, 6-2
2023-06-03vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebbi Davis / Sara Armer vs Aimee Claassen / Pamela Kopplin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-03vs Lovinggood, MarlaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Fleming / Jennifer Hill vs Debbi Davis / Ann Bender6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Nogalski / Margaret Parrish vs Marla Lovinggood / Amy Fangman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Hope / Allison Waters vs Marly McMillen / Patti Cole4-6, 3-6
2023-05-20vs HOA/Gehrke/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesSara Armer / Gretchen Evans vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Jennifer Hill2-6, 0-6
2023-05-20vs Stanziola, LoriWon 20
W#1 DoublesDixie Karnowski / Jennifer Hill vs Maureen Goetz / Betsy Triplett6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Fleming / Anne Hope vs Lori Stanziola / Melinda French6-1, 6-2
2023-05-06vs Wood, CarolWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Fleming / Linda Case vs Bannon Carney / Carol Tenpenny6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Armer / Marcia Jacelone vs Judi Watterson / Ami Horton6-1, 6-3
2023-04-29vs HOA/Holsinger/55&Over8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Fleming / Jennifer Hill vs Jacque Griffey / Renee Steffes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Parrish / Allison Waters vs Susan May / Marsha Taylor6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Nogalski / Anne Hope vs Jody Holsinger / Susie Keefer6-3, 6-1
2023-04-22vs Lovinggood, MarlaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Case / Susan Fleming vs Laura North / Denise McCarthy6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Hope / Cheryl Vaught vs Elaine Schulze / Patti Cole6-7, 5-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Parrish / Allison Waters vs Marly McMillen / Kelly Barnickel6-3, 6-3
2023-04-15vs Stanziola, LoriWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Nogalski / Anne Hope vs Lisa Thompson / Andrea Root7-6, 4-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Fleming / Linda Case vs Sonia Crim / Melinda French6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Hill / Dixie Karnowski vs Candace Asbell / Sara Lester7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Combo - Women - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Sara Armer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.81
Anne Hope
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Chris Livingston
published 4
3.73
Mary Nogalski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.59
Linda Case
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.48
Allison Waters
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Susan Fleming
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Margaret Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Marcia Jacelone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Cheryl Vaught
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Dixie Karnowski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Hill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Parrish + Mary Nogalski5260% games+6.8% vs expected
Anne Hope + Susan Fleming9159% games+2.3% vs expected
Susan Fleming + Linda Case6653% games−0.8% vs expected
Susan Fleming + Mary Nogalski1636% games−11.0% vs expected
Anne Hope + Mary Nogalski4161% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Parrish + Marcia Jacelone314 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Jacelone + Sara Armer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Armer
94W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Anne Hope
112W–53L career · 12 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Chris Livingston
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Nogalski
57W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.73
Linda Case
29W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Allison Waters
33W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Susan Fleming
51W–40L career · 7 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Margaret Parrish
42W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Marcia Jacelone
49W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cheryl Vaught
25W–60L career · 7 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Dixie Karnowski
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Hill
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.