Teams

LTFC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs CHCC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesNaomi Fisher / Celine Ormond vs Sarah Anderson / Elizabeth Morton6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Julie Buckley6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRene Concialdi / Erin Wade vs Brooke O'Donnell / Vanessa Ramich4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJacalyn Peter / Shivani Sharma vs Elise Markel / Lisa DeBastos6-4, 7-5
2022-07-14vs ATC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCeline Ormond / Jacalyn Peter vs Jessica Davis / Martha Solis-Turner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNaomi Fisher vs Charlotte Petersen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Loose / Angie Thompson vs Jenifer Vogelpohl / Riisa Dikeou1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Jennifer Ramsey vs Jackie Brown-Griggs / Laurie MacDowell7-5, 6-2
2022-07-07vs CACM GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesNaomi Fisher / Trish Casson vs Maricris Doolan / Stephanie Kamlet6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesErin Wade vs Kelly Ballenger6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Thompson / Dana Loose vs Heather Johnson / Lynn Kitt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShivani Sharma / Rene Concialdi vs Carol Bedin / Becky Reimers6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-30vs GAC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesCeline Ormond / Trish Casson vs Debra Benge / Ann Baer5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Thompson / Dana Loose vs Spring Merino / Tracy Powers4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJacalyn Peter / Erin Wade vs Tricia Wright / Maureen Roskoski1-6, 2-6
2022-06-23vs CACM PINKLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Naomi Fisher vs Heather Mitchell / Sarah Jensik6-0, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Kai Peters6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacalyn Peter / Rene Concialdi vs Midori Clark / Samantha Hanson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTrish Casson / Shivani Sharma vs Carrie Steuart / Lise Uhrich4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-16vs PTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Jacalyn Peter vs Patti Coker / Shannon Kleinbach3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Loose / Rene Concialdi vs Sarah Crow / Donna Patterson Schirman2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShivani Sharma / Trish Casson vs Holly Strandes / Christine Ford6-2, 6-2
2022-06-09vs GCC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Paulsson / Erin Wade vs Lauren Sveen / Andrea Carrington6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ramsey vs Andrea Karp1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDana Loose / Jacalyn Peter vs Brooke Beasley / Amy Reilly6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRene Concialdi / Shivani Sharma vs Ru Schanman / Rima Hea6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Celine Ormond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Christine Paulsson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Rene Concialdi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.34
Erin Wade
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Naomi Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.27
Trish Casson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Shivani Sharma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Jennifer Ramsey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Dana Loose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jacalyn Peter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shivani Sharma + Trish Casson4257% games+7.4% vs expected
Erin Wade + Rene Concialdi5260% games+3.4% vs expected
Celine Ormond + Rene Concialdi3259% games+0.2% vs expected
Celine Ormond + Christine Paulsson61050% games−2.1% vs expected
Shivani Sharma + Rene Concialdi5452% games−2.6% vs expected
Christine Paulsson + Trish Casson8157% games−3.5% vs expected
Erin Wade + Celine Ormond6076% gamesnot enough data
Rene Concialdi + Trish Casson4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celine Ormond
77W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Christine Paulsson
113W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Rene Concialdi
93W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Erin Wade
101W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Naomi Fisher
58W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Trish Casson
75W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Shivani Sharma
46W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Jennifer Ramsey
43W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Dana Loose
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jacalyn Peter
22W–11L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.