Teams

Goodwin/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Men - Saturday Daytime

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs Shippel/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrian Shubert / David Houlihan vs Andy Hinch / Parker Dixon6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTim Wright / Son Trinh vs Carter Rae / Grant Shippel0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRyan Cluff vs Silas Stricklin1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Lund / Seth Strickland vs Stephen Kraninger / Hunter Piskie2-6, 6-7
2026-05-02vs Patrick/NashilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSon Trinh / Tim Wright vs Nicolas Tempels / Justin Harvey1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Goodwin / Brian Shubert vs Cullen Adre / Turi Clausell6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Welch / Brent Jean vs Nicholas Kaiser / Nicholas Yglesias7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-04-25vs Pierenkemper/Gugala/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatt Lund / Matt McCord vs Joel Berryhill / Jon Gugala3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSon Trinh vs Samuel Raymond1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Houlihan / Tim Wright vs Kevan Lee Lum / Stephan Pierenkemper6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Goodwin / Brent Jean vs Chris Quach / Josh LaWarre6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-08vs Long/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Houlihan / Tim Wright vs Thomas Reyes / Takayuki Niikura6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrent Jean / Brian Shubert vs Eugene Spencer / Chris Brown6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRyan Cluff / Matt McCord vs Samuel Corcoran / Edmund McFadden6-2, 6-4
2026-03-29vs Littleton/Sy/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesSon Trinh / Brian Shubert vs Norbert Molnar / Adam Carter6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTim Wright vs Christopher Sy5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSeth Strickland / Scott Welch vs DHEERAJ MUKATI / Jonathan Mattise1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRyan Cluff vs Jordan Brown4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Lund / Michael Ellsworth vs Brett Truitt / Kevin Coy3-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs Curran/Derenne/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesSon Trinh / David Houlihan vs Chad Porter / Mark Hammond1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Pickelsimer / Matt Lund vs Bryce Davis / Brannon Taylor4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTim Wright vs Henry Varner5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSeth Strickland / Brent Jean vs Aaron Peterson / John Irby1-6, 1-6
2026-03-14vs DeMouy/Piovarcy/NashvilleLost 13
W#1 DoublesDavid Houlihan / Son Trinh vs John Piovarcy / Jason Snap6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTim Wright vs Igor Shalkevich1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatt McCord / Scott Welch vs James Demouy / Stephen Levet2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Goodwin / Ryan Cluff vs Anutham Eashwar / Dean Oleole4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Men - Saturday Daytime
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DeMouy/Piovarcy/Nashville7026924254
2Littleton/Sy/Nashville52221328271
3Shippel/Nashville43211431289
4Pierenkemper/Gugala/Nashville43201535285
5Curran/Derenne/Nashville43201536303
6Patrick/Nashille34161940301
7Goodwin/Nashville16122350358
8Long/Nashville0713469419

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
David Houlihan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
David Pickelsimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Son Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.65
Matt Lund
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Brent Jean
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Michael Ellsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Tim Wright
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.54
Brian Shubert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Scott Welch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Matt McCord
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alexander Mitchell
published 3.5
3.09
Seth Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Ryan Cluff
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Houlihan + Tim Wright5079% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Houlihan
6W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
David Pickelsimer
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Son Trinh
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Matt Lund
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Brent Jean
8W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Michael Ellsworth
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
Tim Wright
10W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
4
Brian Shubert
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Scott Welch
34W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Matt McCord
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Alexander Mitchell
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Seth Strickland
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Ryan Cluff
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.