← Teams

CByrum 5.5

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-11vs SSikesSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesSara Mazurak / Lora Barnett vs Sally Sikes / Mary Strothmann6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Melissa George vs Jane Diepenbrock / Lynn Longest6-4, 6-1
2022-09-27vs AJones 40+ 5.5Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMelissa George / Michele Lagerstedt vs Anna Jones / Jacqueline Morgan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Hauge / CAROLINE FLAMANT vs Julie Liddle / Linda Blevins4-6, 4-6
2022-09-23vs JWOLBORSKY 5.5 COMBO FALLWon 2–0
W#2 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Paula Bullock vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Jill Rhim6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSarah Lukz / Melissa George vs Naomi Rodrigues / Marie Gelston6-1, 6-3
2022-09-20vs LHolmes/FerrellWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesPaula Bullock / Jennifer Sigler vs Melissa Ferrell / Eden Jenkins6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheri Byrum / Sara Mazurak vs Lis Thompson / Kate Chapman6-2, 6-0
2022-09-13vs APershkeWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesSara Mazurak / Lora Barnett vs Marlet Edwards / Emily Boyer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Debra Hauge vs Kelly Day / Courtney Grinnell7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoy Cooper / Michele Lagerstedt vs Mary Elizabeth Phillips / Katherine Rostick4-6, 5-7
2022-08-30vs KHumphrey NRCCWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesCAROLINE FLAMANT / Debra Hauge vs Kimberly Humphrey / Lindsey Taylor6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheri Byrum / Michele Lagerstedt vs Chris Lickey / Amanda Falsone6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sigler / Michelle Pilos vs Paige Coltrera / Meagan Heath6-1, 6-4
2022-08-23vs SSikesWon 2–0
W#1 DoublesLora Barnett / Sarah Lukz vs Jane Diepenbrock / Vanessa Fleischmann6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSara Mazurak / Tracy Wild vs Sally Sikes / Priscilla Nanney6-1, 6-1
2022-08-09vs APershkeSplit 1–1
L#1 DoublesMelissa George / Sara Mazurak vs Carrie Barzola / Catie Cunningham6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheri Byrum / Sarah Lukz vs Kelly Day / Nicole Masters6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Sara Mazurak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Lora Barnett
published —
2.89
CAROLINE FLAMANT
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Melissa George
published —
2.86
Debra Hauge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Michele Lagerstedt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Sarah Lukz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Paula Bullock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Genny Igo
published 3
2.63
Ann Mailly
published 3
2.60
Cheri Byrum
published 3
2.45
Michelle Pilos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CAROLINE FLAMANT + Sarah Lukz11–1248% games−6.2% vs expected
Debra Hauge + CAROLINE FLAMANT2–448% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Lukz + Sara Mazurak4–162% gamesnot enough data
Paula Bullock + Michelle Pilos2–24 matchesnot enough data
CAROLINE FLAMANT + Sara Mazurak1–34 matchesnot enough data
Michele Lagerstedt + Sara Mazurak2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sara Mazurak
168W–65L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
—
Lora Barnett
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
CAROLINE FLAMANT
49W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
—
Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Debra Hauge
73W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Michele Lagerstedt
58W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Sarah Lukz
75W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Paula Bullock
100W–139L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Genny Igo
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Mailly
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Cheri Byrum
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Michelle Pilos
29W–51L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.