Teams

CVTA NAVY

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-07-16vs LTA YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCurt Corrigan / Bob Litwin vs Jim Wilson / Clayton McLaughlin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Winters / Andy James vs Mark Hinman / David Riffel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDean Harper / Curt Corrigan vs Jeff Cline / Andrew Banks1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBob Litwin / Xinlin Li vs Eric Stromberg / Jose Amador2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Perrin / Luis Garza vs Hector Trevino / Bradford Winslow6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Patrick Perrin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Xinlin Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Dean Harper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Curt Corrigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Jansen
published 4.5
3.98
Bob Litwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Richard Best
published
3.77
Andy James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Theo Mandel
published
3.49
Luis Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Leroux
published
Michael Winters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Xinlin Li + Michael Winters314 matchesnot enough data
Bob Litwin + Michael Winters134 matchesnot enough data
Theo Mandel + Michael Winters123 matchesnot enough data
Dean Harper + Michael Winters213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Perrin
34W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
13%86%<1%
4.64
Xinlin Li
23W–9L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Dean Harper
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Curt Corrigan
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
David Jansen
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Bob Litwin
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.98
Richard Best
81W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Andy James
14W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Theo Mandel
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Luis Garza
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
James Leroux
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Winters
20W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.