Teams

HRAC - Pirates

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-23vs CBRC - PorterWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoel Larsen / Judy Dutcher vs Andrea Porter / Karina Klein6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSara Taggart vs Kim Pak6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChris Hatch / Lisa Vinciguerra vs Xingyuan Chen / Yuxia Wu4-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs PFC - JJ BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Vinciguerra / Amy Klee vs Piper Peterson / Dee Beck Information Architect2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Stanfield vs Lilia Kondo1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChris Hatch / Judy Dutcher vs Kate Blevins / Anne Schnurman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-22vs EW-PC-KhounnalaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Stanfield / Sara Taggart vs Makena Nyby / Hannah Fiocchi5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Vinciguerra vs Britney Donais4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Dutcher / Noel Larsen vs Trista Self / Lexi Adams4-6, 3-6
2025-02-21vs YTC - Alley CatsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Taggart / Leslie Stanfield vs Jacqueline Degrasse / Kellye Richelderfer6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNoel Larsen vs Mandy Manning1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Vinciguerra / Amy Klee vs Pamela Urquhart / Sasha Grigoryants6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Khounnala3193890
2YTC - Alley Cats318411106
3PFC - JJ Balls227513103
4CBRC - Porter134818124
5HRAC - Pirates1321020120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Owen Suagee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
2.27
Leslie Stanfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Amy Klee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Chris Hatch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Judy Dutcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Vinciguerra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Noel Larsen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Taggart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Owen Suagee
42W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
4.45
Leslie Stanfield
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Amy Klee
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Chris Hatch
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Dutcher
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Vinciguerra
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noel Larsen
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Taggart
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.