Teams

LOTC-Bozzini

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-07vs PTC-FelkerLost 13
L#1 DoublesApril Razey / Beverly Placko vs Sarah Felker / Robin Browne5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesVanessa Gebbie vs Melinee Steck3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHilary Conway vs Allison Stewart1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKitty Yan / Kimberley Hebdon vs Laura Baughman / Lisa Johnston-Smith6-2, 6-2
2025-05-30vs WHRC-HaLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Witt / Vanessa Gebbie vs Janet Ha / Mihye Ko7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlana Miner vs Heather Dale6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHilary Conway / Kitty Yan vs Diana Blebea / Vicki Mark1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSidney Clarke / Kimberley Hebdon vs Misug Kim / Jing Bennett7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-10vs IRV-Duval/QuislingLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlana Miner / April Razey vs Kathy Cooke / Angela Jackson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKitty Yan / Cindy Richards vs Philberta Leung / Wendy Buchanan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Hudspeth / Sidney Clarke vs Ashley Bevan / Michelle Boucher1-6, 3-6
2025-05-02vs THPRD-Li/HollandLost 14
L#1 DoublesKitty Bozzini / Sidney Clarke vs Yu Zhang / Nicole Norby0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVanessa Gebbie vs Catherine Huang4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHilary Conway / Beverly Placko vs Judy Chaput / Shuping Li3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKitty Yan vs Erin Canova0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAlana Miner / Anna Curtis vs Janice Kuo / Manisha Thakkar6-3, 6-1
2025-04-12vs CGM-Heredia/PalenaLost 04
L#1 DoublesKitty Bozzini / Alana Miner vs Erin Ince / Delena Palena3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesVanessa Gebbie vs Zoey Mikalatos2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Eastburn-Larsen / Sidney Clarke vs Cyndi Johnson / Tiffany Starkey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberley Hebdon / Kitty Yan vs Chana Dolbey / Christina Parks0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-06vs GLVR-Crowley/DaoudWon 31
W#1 DoublesSidney Clarke / Hilary Conway vs Katja Daoud / Deb Landau6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnna Curtis vs Lauren Kinderknecht3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesApril Razey / Beverly Placko vs Anna Tsoi / Luz Zanavich6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesVanessa Gebbie vs Emma Chait6-4, 6-4
2025-03-29vs MAC-DempseyLost 14
L#1 DoublesKitty Bozzini / Sidney Clarke vs Barbra Jorgensen / Anne Miller4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Gebbie vs Ella Mills6-3, 6-6
L#2 DoublesHilary Conway / Michelle Witt vs Jennifer Bifano / Abigail Cupper5-7, 2-5
L#2 SinglesAlana Miner vs Emily Shields4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKitty Yan / Michelle Eastburn-Larsen vs Erin Dineen / Kristan Summers2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Curtis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Beverly Placko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Kimberley Hebdon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Alana Miner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.53
Hilary Conway
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Vanessa Gebbie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.48
Sidney Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Kitty Bozzini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Cindy Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Kitty Yan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
April Razey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Michelle Eastburn-Larsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Witt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Hudspeth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kitty Bozzini + Sidney Clarke2437% games−3.7% vs expected
Michelle Eastburn-Larsen + Sidney Clarke3531% games−8.3% vs expected
Alana Miner + Kitty Bozzini033 matchesnot enough data
Alana Miner + Sidney Clarke213 matchesnot enough data
Alana Miner + April Razey033 matchesnot enough data
Kitty Bozzini + Vanessa Gebbie213 matchesnot enough data
Kitty Yan + Cindy Richards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Curtis
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Beverly Placko
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberley Hebdon
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alana Miner
33W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Hilary Conway
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Vanessa Gebbie
15W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
Sidney Clarke
31W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Kitty Bozzini
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Cindy Richards
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
Kitty Yan
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27
2.5
April Razey
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Eastburn-Larsen
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Witt
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Hudspeth
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.