Teams

Vivante - Madean

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 7.0 X

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-07vs LEECHAR/Rubio/18&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarl Peterson / Judy Roberts vs Patricia Sareh / Kenrick Gallander2-6, 4-6
2025-05-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarl Peterson / Judy Roberts vs Fausto Ponce / Gabriela de Luigi Kelly7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-17vs Seminole Lakes - DomingoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Roberts / Darwin Hormann vs Cathy Hysell / Eric Knapp5-7, 3-6
2025-05-10vs Paseo - HynesLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarl Peterson / Judy Roberts vs Michael Pawielski / Nancy Aloia6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-09vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarl Peterson / Judy Roberts vs Fernando Lugones / Daniela Aguirre Lugones6-2, 7-5
2025-05-03vs UTC - SolisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarl Peterson / Judy Roberts vs Steve McDonald / Vicki Mueller6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobert Madean / Edie Schwenck vs Tony Weiler / Denise Blough5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Barbara Robinson
published 3.5
3.28
Carl Peterson
published 3.5
3.22
Darwin Hormann
published 3.5
2.76
Daniel Kaplan
published 3
2.75
David Beier
published 3
Edie Schwenck
published
Glen Dilley
published
Janet Kramer
published
Joseph Voyles
published
Judy Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Robert Madean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Theriault
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edie Schwenck + Carl Peterson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Robinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carl Peterson
6W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Darwin Hormann
0W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Daniel Kaplan
3W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
David Beier
2W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Edie Schwenck
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Glen Dilley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Voyles
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Roberts
16W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorraine Heckman Schmidt
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Madean
25W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Theriault
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.