Teams

Homeboys

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-06vs Tryin' Again AiyaaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJun Takayama / Tim Kelley vs Marc Cayetano / Tyler Makabe6-1, 6-2
2025-08-16vs Corks & CacklesWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad Shibuya / Jordan Doi vs Kurt Irvine / Travis Yoshimoto6-3, 7-6
2025-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesChad Shibuya / Jordan Doi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-02vs Southside KoleaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCody Lau / Jordan Doi vs Benjamin Dunn / Marcus Pearman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-21vs Tryin' Again AiyaaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJun Takayama / Chad Shibuya vs Gregory Zukeran / Jace Akagi-Okuma6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-13vs Corks & CacklesWon 10
W#1 DoublesChad Shibuya / Harold Shimono vs Jeff Gaddi / Kurt Irvine6-2, 6-4
2025-07-06vs Tennis Villians 4.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJun Takayama / Tim Kelley vs Logan Bautista-Duldulao / Zen Terao4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs Southside KoleaWon 10
W#1 DoublesHarold Shimono / Cody Lau vs Benjamin Dunn / Stephan Ogasawara6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tryin' Again Aiyaa6262556
2Corks & Cackles5353659
3Homeboys5353753
4Tennis Villians 4.535351172
5Southside Kolea17171591

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Chad Shibuya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Harold Shimono
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Jordan Doi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Cody Lau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Tim Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jun Takayama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Shibuya + Harold Shimono5062% games+5.2% vs expected
Harold Shimono + Cody Lau6164% gamesnot enough data
Chad Shibuya + Jordan Doi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chad Shibuya
188W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Harold Shimono
148W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
Jordan Doi
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4
Cody Lau
59W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.19
4.5
Tim Kelley
134W–112L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
4.02
Jun Takayama
25W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.