Teams

SD LLW 5.0 Barnes TC/ Hough

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD

9 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-14vs WC SD 5.0 Peninsula TC/ Tobi OjoLost 12
L#1 DoublesEvan Dankiewicz / KASHYAP ASHOK vs William Chiu / Oluwatobi Ojo7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lipscomb vs Alex Nemerov6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGregory de Andrade / Charles Hough vs Steven Chen / Lucio Cangiano3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesGregory de Andrade / Jochem Hoefnagels vs Adam Levie / Charles Qian2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lipscomb vs Peter Trhac6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCharles Hough / Frederik Wilkens vs Ryan McBride / Jordan Angus3-6, 4-6
2025-05-18vs WC SD 5.0 Peninsula TC/ Tobi OjoLost 12
L#1 DoublesJochem Hoefnagels / Frederik Wilkens vs Andras Bori / Lucio Cangiano4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lipscomb vs Steven Chen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMax Mereles / Evan Dankiewicz vs Oluwatobi Ojo / William Chiu3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesEvan Dankiewicz / Gregory de Andrade vs Roman Shenkiryk / Andrew Wakefield4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lipscomb vs Rafael Martinez6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Hough / Elias Scandalis vs Peter Trhac / Jeffrey Fitch1-6, 1-6
2025-04-12vs WC SD 5.0 Peninsula TC/ Tobi OjoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKASHYAP ASHOK / Gregory de Andrade vs Andras Bori / Lucio Cangiano6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesPatrick Lipscomb vs William Chiu2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Hough / Evan Dankiewicz vs Alex Nemerov / Oluwatobi Ojo2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charles Hough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Elias Scandalis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Evan Dankiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Frederik Wilkens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Gregory de Andrade
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
Jochem Hoefnagels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
KASHYAP ASHOK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Max Mereles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Lipscomb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Hough + Gregory de Andrade2355% gamesnot enough data
Jochem Hoefnagels + Charles Hough303 matchesnot enough data
Gregory de Andrade + KASHYAP ASHOK303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Charles Hough
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Elias Scandalis
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Evan Dankiewicz
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Frederik Wilkens
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Gregory de Andrade
9W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jochem Hoefnagels
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
KASHYAP ASHOK
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Max Mereles
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Lipscomb
13W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.