Teams

GTC:AlwaysLate:Borman/

2025 NCT Tri Level Women · 4.0 Women Tri Level 1

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-09vs MRC:Tri-Breakers:LopezWon 10
W#1 DoublesBecky Baran / Megan Borman vs JoAnn Lopez / Jackie Zoldy6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-25vs FV:Net Worth:Sorensen/Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Becky Baran vs Valerie Sorensen / Kristina Keegan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Becky Baran vs Amy Willard / Debra Gendreau6-3, 7-6
2025-11-06vs RH:Tri Harder:Baron/BaronWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Virginia Blair vs Celia Ponvert / Dani Woods6-3, 6-2
2025-10-24vs GTC:Twisted Tri:Leshem/PiazzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Blair / Megan Borman vs Suzanne Baxter / Karen Piazza6-2, 6-1
2025-10-17vs MRC:Luv Wins:Palanzo/Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Stacey Weinstein vs Michele Palanzo / Barbara Kiselak6-3, 6-1
2025-10-15vs BTC:Lucky Bananas:LeRoy/Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Becky Baran vs Melanie LeRoy / Colleen Collins6-2, 6-3
2025-09-26vs FV:Level Up:GrantWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Stacey Weinstein vs Jennifer King / Cari Anne Goodwin6-1, 6-2
2025-09-25vs FV:Queens of the Court:Sansone/Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Borman / Becky Baran vs Esther Aronson / Laurie Sansone7-5, 4-5
2025-09-16vs GTC:Not My Fault:Eller/McAuliffeWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Weinstein / Virginia Blair vs Suzanne Mc Auliffe / Karen Eller6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 4.0 Women Tri Level 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Nor’easter Winners:Gremli/Willard0853979
2BTC:Lucky Bananas:LeRoy/0944988
3RH:Tri Harder:Baron/Baron09351397
4GTC:AlwaysLate:Borman/01090255
5FV:Level Up:Grant01073780
6MRC:Luv Wins:Palanzo/010631095
7FV:Net Worth:Sorensen/010541192
8FV:Queens of the Court:Sansone/0104512100
9GTC:Twisted Tri:Leshem/Piazza0104515100
10MRC:Tri-Breakers:Lopez0101817102
11GTC:Not My Fault:Eller/McAuliffe0101918114

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Megan Borman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Becky Baran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Virginia Blair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Stacey Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Borman + Becky Baran511759% games+5.5% vs expected
Stacey Weinstein + Virginia Blair7658% games+0.8% vs expected
Virginia Blair + Becky Baran1444% games−15.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Borman
65W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Becky Baran
65W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Virginia Blair
107W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Stacey Weinstein
93W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.