Teams

Sweetwater - Fun Friday

*2025 Houston Fall League (2024)NA Friday Ladies Day League · 3.5 Ladies Doubles

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Britny Trevino
published 3.5
3.55
Mimi Tarantino
published
3.52
Monica Rayburn
published
3.41
Kelly Kinch
published
3.40
Sheila Kraft
published
3.39
Anna Kelley
published 3.5
3.38
Kerri Ross
published
3.31
Luana Pereira
published
3.28
Kathleen Rosseland
published
3.28
Joanne Hresko
published
3.25
Siri Vann
published
3.25
Rebecca Wells
published
3.18
Mindy Cabble
published
3.15
Lori Hanish
published
3.11
Jessica Melchor
published
2.99
Cassie Oppman
published
Cristina Goolsby
published
Joy Zheng
published
Tina Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Rayburn + Britny Trevino5168% games+14.7% vs expected
Siri Vann + Monica Rayburn5357% games+10.7% vs expected
Kelly Kinch + Sheila Kraft4354% games−5.5% vs expected
Kelly Kinch + Luana Pereira6066% gamesnot enough data
Lori Hanish + Siri Vann314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Rosseland + Luana Pereira224 matchesnot enough data
Monica Rayburn + Kelly Kinch314 matchesnot enough data
Luana Pereira + Britny Trevino314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Britny Trevino
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Mimi Tarantino
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Monica Rayburn
39W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Kelly Kinch
35W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Sheila Kraft
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Anna Kelley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kerri Ross
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Luana Pereira
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Kathleen Rosseland
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Joanne Hresko
12W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Siri Vann
28W–24L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
Rebecca Wells
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Mindy Cabble
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Lori Hanish
19W–21L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Jessica Melchor
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Cassie Oppman
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Cristina Goolsby
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joy Zheng
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Nguyen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.