Teams

RJampani (Blakeney)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-28vs ADuncan (JATC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Ashlee Pickering vs Georgia Cook / Lauren Moskowitz6-4, 6-0
2023-09-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Scarlett Cochran vs Jillene McGovern / Trena Thomas6-4, 6-4
2023-09-14vs JKarasek (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Jessee / Antoinette Tan vs Tricia Sistrunk / Caroline Dudley7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-12vs MWolf (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Jessee / Ashlee Pickering vs Kristina Campbell / Kelsey Gerber6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Antoinette Tan vs Laurie Madonna / Heather Burch4-6, 4-6
2023-08-31vs CRowe (Raintree)Won 20
W#2 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Antoinette Tan vs Emily Ladky / Madison Brown6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Polonus / Ashlee Pickering vs Elizabeth Laur / Christina Hall6-1, 7-5
2023-08-24vs TLaBrosse/JRafferty (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Ashlee Pickering vs Brooke Cole / Andrea Whitmore6-4, 6-0
2023-08-17vs BGodfrey/JMiller (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRadhika Jampani / Ashlee Pickering vs Janie Miller / Sue Ann Lang4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Scarlett Cochran
published 3.5
2.82
Ashlee Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Megan Jessee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.42
Antoinette Tan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.28
Radhika Jampani
published
1.97
Maureen Polonus
published
1.96
Anne Talmage
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antoinette Tan + Ashlee Pickering5949% games+6.8% vs expected
Megan Jessee + Ashlee Pickering13953% games+1.2% vs expected
Antoinette Tan + Megan Jessee51245% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Scarlett Cochran
74W–61L career · type A · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Ashlee Pickering
47W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Megan Jessee
45W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Antoinette Tan
69W–117L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.42
Radhika Jampani
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.28
Maureen Polonus
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.97
2.5
Anne Talmage
3W–14L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.