Teams

GAC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs LTFC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesShawn Harrison / Brandon Paxton vs David Benson / Donny Nguyen3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Jie Guo2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Runda / Marcus McAskin vs Richard Best / Tim Hester5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Thomas Chalk / Firmin GorraDiallo4-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs WC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesBrandon Paxton / Michael Barney vs David Tulloch / Raul Uribe7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Todd Nichols6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Hipshman / Shawn Harrison vs Tim Wilson / Mathew Jones6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Runda / Thomas Forti vs Evan Ela / Michael Martin6-3, 6-1
2026-07-01vs PCRK GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesMichael Runda / David Hipshman vs Dean Schafer / Bruce Eldredge7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Jon Szumny7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Barney / Brandon Paxton vs Andrew Smolenski / William Mahaffy6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Todd Campbell / Hoang Nguyen6-2, 6-3
2026-06-24vs SKY BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Hipshman / Shawn Harrison vs Daniel Cho / Brian Capstick6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Paul Krueger7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Reed / Brandon Paxton vs Seth Meyer / Coupar Lester6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Simpson / Richard Smith vs Dean Elson / John Barker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-17vs LTFC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarcus McAskin / Michael Runda vs Alex Hmyrak / Kumar Verma4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Dushyanth David Maguluru1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShawn Harrison / David Hipshman vs Jonathan Muslow / James Shaw6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesThomas Forti / Michael Barney vs Ram Parashar / Hariharan Kannan3-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs LTFC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrandon Paxton / Michael Runda vs Chris Fahlbusch / Donnie Criswell2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Edward Su3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Barney / David Hipshman vs Chu Son / Brant Coles3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartin Rankin / Shawn Harrison vs Matt Whitmer / Tim Hester4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs WC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichael Runda / Michael Barney vs Michael Martin / Raul Uribe6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephen Parmentier vs Matt Bailey6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Hipshman / Brandon Paxton vs Evan Ela / Mathew Jones6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Reed / Martin Rankin vs Stuart Spath / Martin Atlas6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Stephen Parmentier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Martin Rankin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Brandon Paxton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Alan Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Michael Barney
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Michael Runda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Marcus McAskin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Shawn Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
David Hipshman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Patrick Reed
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Thomas Forti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Reed + Martin Rankin151854% games+0.2% vs expected
Michael Runda + Thomas Forti2349% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Reed + Thomas Forti3262% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Reed + Marcus McAskin224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Forti + David Hipshman134 matchesnot enough data
David Hipshman + Shawn Harrison314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Runda + Marcus McAskin123 matchesnot enough data
Marcus McAskin + David Hipshman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephen Parmentier
91W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Martin Rankin
55W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Brandon Paxton
21W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Alan Simpson
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Barney
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Michael Runda
65W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Marcus McAskin
30W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Shawn Harrison
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
David Hipshman
29W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Patrick Reed
58W–138L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Thomas Forti
82W–106L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.