Teams

RAFAEL RC 40AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-08vs MARIN TC 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#1 SinglesNick Stiritz vs PATRICK WHITGROVE6-0, 6-1
2025-01-26vs ROLLING HILLS 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesNick Stiritz vs George Papadoyannis6-0, 6-3
2025-01-18vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesNick Stiritz vs Eric Debbane6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Geoff Hazard
published
3.75
Jason Bousquet
published
3.71
Nick Stiritz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Chris Beard
published 3.5
3.37
Madhur Dayal
published
3.29
Greg Martinez
published
3.26
Roland Davantes
published
Christopher Stewart
published 3.5
3.22
Kevin Scheer
published
3.10
Matthew Alba
published
3.04
Sean Peisert
published
3.03
Ted Hayden
published
3.01
Mark Krajan
published
2.63
Craig Thigpen
published 3
2.56
David Wallerich
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Phil Neal
published
Tom Poser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Beard + Roland Davantes6258% games+13.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geoff Hazard
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Jason Bousquet
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Nick Stiritz
30W–23L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Chris Beard
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Madhur Dayal
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Greg Martinez
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Roland Davantes
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Christopher Stewart
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Scheer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Matthew Alba
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sean Peisert
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Ted Hayden
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Mark Krajan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Craig Thigpen
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
David Wallerich
0W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Phil Neal
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Poser
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.