Teams

Tahoe

2023 Adult 55 & Over · Women 9.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.17 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-23vs STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDenise Inman / Sandy Ashmore vs Sherry Taylor / Felice Rolnick3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Steinmetz / Shelley Fridley vs Lorrie Crossett / Carrie Lutterman1-6, 0-6
2023-05-16vs STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Ashmore / Shelley Fridley vs Antoinette Kovar / Dana Metzger3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Inman / Linda Steinmetz vs Mary Bazan / Alice Hobaugh4-6, 6-7
2023-05-09vs STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDenise Inman / Betty Feder vs Kari Richardson / Carrie Lutterman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynthia Harrison / Laura Dyer vs Antoinette Kovar / Felice Rolnick4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-05-02vs STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Steinmetz / Sandy Ashmore vs Victoria Wright / Dana Metzger6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDenise Inman / Laura Dyer vs Antoinette Kovar / Kari Richardson6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Fridley / Betty Feder vs Felice Rolnick / Carrie Lutterman4-6, 1-6
2023-04-25Split 11
W#1 DoublesSandy Ashmore / Linda Steinmetz vs Kari Richardson / Victoria Wright3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Harrison / Betty Feder vs Carrie Lutterman / Alice Hobaugh3-6, 4-6
2023-04-18vs STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDenise Inman / Sandy Ashmore vs Lorrie Crossett / Antoinette Kovar5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Fridley / Linda Steinmetz vs Mary Bazan / Dana Metzger2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Richardson/55&Over9.0W60162795
2Tahoe0621634202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Ruedeemard Odanaka
published 4.5
3.70
Laura Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Cynthia Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Denise Inman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.38
Shelley Fridley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandy Ashmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Harrison + Laura Dyer0541% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ruedeemard Odanaka
98W–95L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Laura Dyer
14W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Cynthia Harrison
75W–103L career · 7 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Denise Inman
255W–128L career · 7 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Shelley Fridley
36W–86L career · 6 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Sandy Ashmore
27W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.