Teams

EE:Over the Hill:Romond

2025 VT Adult 65 & Over Men · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over Men Div

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-07vs EE:HuntLost 12
L#1 DoublesEdward McMahon / William Romond vs Dave Reville / Frank von Turkovich4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Babbott / Bernie Schachter vs John Willey / Richard Goldsborough6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlexander Kish / Peter Gale vs Russ Colvin / Jay Buckley1-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs EE:HuntLost 12
W#1 DoublesBernie Schachter / Edward McMahon vs Dave Reville / Frank von Turkovich6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFrank Babbott / Jay Thornburg vs John Hunt / Scott Baldwin3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlexander Kish / Robert McLane vs Russ Colvin / Jay Buckley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-27vs EE:HuntWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Romond / Edward McMahon vs Richard Goldsborough / John Hunt6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPeter Gale / Jay Thornburg vs Scott Baldwin / John Willey3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesFrank Babbott / Bernie Schachter vs Dave Reville / Jay Buckley7-6, 5-3
2025-06-16vs EE:HuntWon 21
W#1 DoublesEdward McMahon / William Romond vs Frank von Turkovich / Richard Goldsborough6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert McLane / Alexander Kish vs Scott Baldwin / John Willey1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesFrank Babbott / Bernie Schachter vs Jay Buckley / John Hunt6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over Men Div
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EE:Over the Hill:Romond226612107
2EE:Hunt226613112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Frank Babbott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Bernie Schachter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Edward McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alexander Kish
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jay Thornburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Gale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert McLane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Romond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Romond + Edward McMahon213 matchesnot enough data
Frank Babbott + Bernie Schachter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Frank Babbott
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bernie Schachter
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Edward McMahon
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alexander Kish
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Thornburg
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Gale
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert McLane
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Romond
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.