Teams

CSRC MACLIZ

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19vs CCOC MAYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Olivia Salmon vs Jared May / Megan May7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrank Coyle / Monica MacLiz vs David Adams / Claudia Goddard6-2, 6-4
2024-05-12vs MEMPK BARKERLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica MacLiz / Mark Hutter vs Joshua Voss / Kimberly McLaurin4-6, 3-6
2024-05-05vs LTFCS DANIELWon 20
W#1 DoublesMonica MacLiz / Patrick Ramirez vs Jessica Hilton / David Clipsham4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMallory Marlin / John Buerschen vs Kimberly Schumacher . / John Abbott6-2, 6-3
2024-04-28vs FLYHS SAXBYLost 01
L#2 DoublesMonica MacLiz / Mark Hutter vs Eric Howard / Amy Saxby5-7, 4-6
2024-04-21vs CCW WOLFEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Monica MacLiz vs Emily Butler / Nick Hill6-3, 6-1
2024-04-14vs CSRC CARPENTERLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica MacLiz / Mark Hutter vs Carolayne Henry / Harold Woods6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-07vs CSRC SWENSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Buerschen / Olivia Salmon vs Jane Corral / Bruce Wadman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
John Buerschen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.22
Patrick Ramirez
published
4.18
Frank Coyle
published
3.87
Mallory Marlin
published
3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Monica MacLiz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
3.31
Stephanie Brock
published
Jennifer Kapitan
published
John Hunt
published
Mark Hutter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Coyle + Stephanie Brock3547% gamesnot enough data
Olivia Salmon + John Buerschen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
John Buerschen
28W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
Patrick Ramirez
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Frank Coyle
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
Mallory Marlin
23W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Monica MacLiz
57W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Christina Bardsley
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Stephanie Brock
30W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Jennifer Kapitan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Hunt
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Hutter
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.