Teams

Flint River/Susie Hartzog

2022 Flint River USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter · MXD 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-01-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesNiki Cox / Trey Gossett vs Korey Burton / Winston Price6-4, 6-2
2022-01-09vs Shiver 7.0/CamillaWon 10
W#2 DoublesNiki Cox / Joe McGlincy vs Jarvis Atkins / Amy Bowles6-0, 6-1
2021-12-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesNiki Cox / Trey Gossett vs Meghan Heckman / Jimmy Heckman6-1, 6-0
2021-12-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoe McGlincy / Susie Hartzog vs William Birdsong / Maria Green7-5, 6-1
2021-11-30vs Powell/BainbridgeWon 10
W#3 DoublesNiki Cox / Trey Gossett vs Winston Price / Carol Heard6-1, 6-2
2021-11-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoe McGlincy / Sheila Edwards vs Craig Moore / Betty Ehrhardt6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MXD 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Stephen Mayfield
published
3.43
Susie Hartzog
published
3.37
Niki Cox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Leigh Cooper
published
Darrell Cox
published 3.5
3.23
Joe McGlincy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Sheryl Cannington
published
3.00
Royce Cannington
published
Kent Forrester
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Cooper + Niki Cox10157% games+1.0% vs expected
Stephen Mayfield + Joe McGlincy0636% games+0.3% vs expected
Joe McGlincy + Niki Cox5748% games−7.1% vs expected
Sheryl Cannington + Leigh Cooper5167% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Cooper + Joe McGlincy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Mayfield
3W–22L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
Susie Hartzog
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Niki Cox
51W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Leigh Cooper
59W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Darrell Cox
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Joe McGlincy
74W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sheryl Cannington
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Royce Cannington
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Kent Forrester
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.