Teams

LOCH.Gloer

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-01vs TOC.HariharanLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Moore / Daryn Watson vs Pradeep Hariharan / Bharat Awasthi4-6, 2-6
2024-07-11vs TOC.PuriLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Daniel Moore vs Asim Javaid / Vijay Sharma2-6, 4-6
2024-06-27vs PW.RoussinLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Bone / Bob Cwikla vs Jacob Comer / Colin Hayward1-6, 0-6
2024-06-06vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Bob Schanz vs Deraymes Harris / Frederick Holding1-6, 0-6
2024-05-30vs TOC.SalianLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Estroff / Daryn Watson vs Kapil Dukle / Ajit Shankardas7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-23vs TOC.TaoWon 10
W#3 DoublesBob Schanz / Bob Cwikla vs Zihao Li / Tzu-Yao Lin6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Jeff Estroff
published
3.48
Pedro Torrejon
published
3.29
Jay Cutler
published
3.12
Daryn Watson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
2.92
Arthur Gloer
published 3
2.84
Bob Cwikla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Keith Kasberg
published
2.58
2.53
Bob Schanz
published 3
2.30
Robert Bone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daryn Watson + Bob Cwikla2442% gamesnot enough data
Arthur Gloer + Bob Cwikla123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Estroff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Pedro Torrejon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Jay Cutler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Arthur Gloer
39W–59L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Bob Cwikla
40W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Keith Kasberg
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Christopher Mielke
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
2.58
3
Bob Schanz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Robert Bone
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.