Teams

KY/LOU/HAWKINS

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-18vs KY/LOU/HUDSON/RENDAWon 50
W#1 DoublesKate Weber / Abbey Heird vs Allison Maher / Stephanie Mason6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLindsey Underhill vs Karen Sturm6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacie Tuggle / Sarah Wilson vs Lashae Higdon / Stephanie Saxton6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTatiane Cavallazzi / Cassie Stokes vs Margaret Cotter / Martha Hudson6-0, 6-3
W#4 DoublesLouisa Lewandowski / Amber Bowling vs Andrea Schnurr / JESSICA MOORE6-2, 6-1
2025-03-08vs KY/LOU/BROWN/SPILLMANWon 41
L#1 DoublesCarey Goldstein / Tatiane Cavallazzi vs Judette Baylon / Leiellen Atz3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Underhill vs Laura Spillman7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLee Harring / Carolyn Wilmes vs Jen Root / MJ Kik6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Novak / Ashley Butler vs Kimberly French / Janet Parrish6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesSarah Wilson / Amy Faust vs Lindsay Brown / Sarah Clevenger6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Lauren Novak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Kate Weber
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Katie Shrewsberry
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Amy Faust
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Lee Harring
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Abbey Heird
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Amber Bowling
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Stacie Tuggle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Lauren Coury
published
3.31
Louisa Lewandowski
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Ashley Wilhem
published 3.5
3.25
Ashley Butler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Lindsey Underhill
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Carey Goldstein
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Cassie Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Carolyn Wilmes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Kelly Underwood
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.00
Tatiane Cavallazzi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louisa Lewandowski + Carey Goldstein3444% gamesnot enough data
Cassie Stokes + Ashley Butler134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Faust + Abbey Heird224 matchesnot enough data
Cassie Stokes + Louisa Lewandowski213 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Tuggle + Carolyn Wilmes303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Novak + Ashley Butler213 matchesnot enough data
Amber Bowling + Lee Harring123 matchesnot enough data
Kate Weber + Abbey Heird123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Novak
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Kate Weber
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Katie Shrewsberry
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Amy Faust
14W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lee Harring
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Abbey Heird
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amber Bowling
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stacie Tuggle
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Lauren Coury
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Louisa Lewandowski
10W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Ashley Wilhem
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Ashley Butler
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Lindsey Underhill
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carey Goldstein
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cassie Stokes
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carolyn Wilmes
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Kelly Underwood
1W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Tatiane Cavallazzi
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.