Teams

Win, Repeat

2026 Tri Level Women · 5.0, 4.5, 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-05-16vs Northern: ChodakLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatharine Attwell / Natalie Weaver vs Zoe Chodak / Fiorella Jaime2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristina Gray / Rachel Krackeler vs Jess Fichera / Jennifer Gonyea6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTai St John / Angela Miczek vs Ellen Robertson / Brandi Falcone4-6, 0-6
2026-05-09vs Northern: ChodakWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatalie Weaver / Ann Phillips vs Zoe Chodak / Joana Sun4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Brahler / Christina Gray vs Lisa Allison / Beverly Swimm7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErika Diffley / Virginia Zanotti vs Brandi Falcone / Hillary Cooley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Northern: ChodakWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatharine Attwell / Natalie Weaver vs Zoe Chodak / Joana Sun6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Gray / Shelley Brahler vs Jennifer Gonyea / Lisa Allison6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Erika Diffley vs Ellen Robertson / Brandi Falcone0-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs Northern: ChodakLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatharine Attwell / Taylor Heintz vs Zoe Chodak / Fiorella Jaime6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristina Gray / Olivia Fraser vs Lisa Allison / Ellen Robertson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShelley Brahler / Angela Miczek vs Hillary Cooley / Brandi Falcone4-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs Northern: ChodakLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Phillips / Taylor Heintz vs Zoe Chodak / Fiorella Jaime3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Brahler / Christina Gray vs Jennifer Gonyea / Lisa Allison6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Schrader / Angela Miczek vs Hillary Cooley / Brandi Falcone6-7, 3-6
2026-04-11vs Northern: ChodakLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Dawn Keenan vs Jess Fichera / Carrie Hoffman6-7, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Robertson / Virginia Zanotti vs Andrea Murray / Ericka Blackburn6-2, 4-5
2026-03-21vs Northern: TriLevel 4.0 RaffaLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Susan Cortes vs Debbie Vananden / Susan Quine-Laurilliard2-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs Northern: ChodakLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Breen / Shelley Brahler vs Brandi Falcone / Hillary Cooley2-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs Get a GripLost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Brahler / Melanie Wishart vs Lizzie Barlow / Virginia Zanotti3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-14vs Northern: TriLevel 4.0 RaffaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Wishart / Sandra Nolte vs Debbie Vananden / Susan Quine-Laurilliard6-0, 6-4
2026-02-01vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelley Brahler / Melanie Wishart vs Andrea Peters / Joanne DeTore6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Virginia Zanotti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Christina Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Rachel Krackeler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Shelley Brahler
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.81
Angela Miczek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Melanie Wishart
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Erika Diffley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Michelle Schrader
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Natalie Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Tai St John
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Heintz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Wishart + Rachel Krackeler731762% games+5.8% vs expected
Angela Miczek + Shelley Brahler72242% games−2.9% vs expected
Tai St John + Shelley Brahler0530% gamesnot enough data
Angela Miczek + Tai St John033 matchesnot enough data
Christina Gray + Shelley Brahler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Zanotti
14W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
4.29
4.5
Christina Gray
31W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
Rachel Krackeler
124W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
4.16
4
Shelley Brahler
74W–87L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Angela Miczek
108W–104L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Melanie Wishart
128W–85L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Erika Diffley
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Michelle Schrader
48W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Natalie Weaver
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
3.65
Tai St John
55W–85L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Olivia Fraser
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Heintz
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.