Teams

CVTA RED

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-11vs BCC NAVYLost 01
L#1 SinglesSunnie Glaister vs Leslie Herz3-6, 0-6
2022-09-08vs LTA SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Romero / Patricia Jamison vs Sara Fedorka / Tracey Graham3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKirsten Roeber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Jensen / Sunnie Glaister vs Lindsey Cheney / Ann Lomax6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSunnie Glaister vs Kristen Ford4-6, 0-6
2022-08-18vs BRMST BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynn Schulte / Catherine Romero vs Laura Tedesco / Erin Kintzle7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKirsten Roeber / Jennifer Mitchell vs Denise Belton / Claudia Booton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-11vs LTA GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Jamison / Catherine Romero vs Teri Ohan / KATIE Lehr3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSunnie Glaister vs Jill Mendoza2-6, 0-6
2022-08-04vs RMTC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Schulte / Catherine Romero vs Jennifer Ufland / Pauline Lahey3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSunnie Glaister vs Allison Becker0-6, 1-6
2022-07-28vs BRMST GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPatricia Jamison / Catherine Romero vs Michele Gosselin / Hillary Riley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSunnie Glaister vs Noelle Anthony0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Lynn Schulte
published
3.68
Mary Jensen
published
3.60
Catherine Romero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Sunnie Glaister
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
Kirsten Roeber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Patricia Jamison
published
2.94
Marion Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Jamison + Kirsten Roeber51838% games−7.0% vs expected
Lynn Schulte + Catherine Romero314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Schulte
59W–40L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
4.13
4
Andrea Firstenberg
6W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jensen
25W–38L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Catherine Romero
86W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Sunnie Glaister
47W–25L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Kirsten Roeber
21W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Patricia Jamison
19W–52L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Marion Fisher
16W–26L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.