Teams

Tennis Club of Hastings

2023 55&Over Women · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-09vs SPORTIME WestchesterLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne Young / Karen Healy vs Dottie Poppas / Finola Hurley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Janice Shepps vs Andrea Kischkat / Elaine Hartstein3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathy Martin / Susan Moscou vs Carol Sherman / Randi Menchel4-6, 0-6
2023-08-02vs Saw Mill CinderellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaud Tucker / Catherine Mulhern vs Laura Feder / Anne Marie Norberto6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Martin / Janice Shepps vs Pamela Suett / Cathleen Newsham6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJudith Hirsch / Carol Troy vs Ethel Wagner / Marcia Grubel6-1, 6-2
2023-07-31vs West Nyack TennisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Anne Young vs Eileen del Rosario / Diane Mayer6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarol Troy / Janice Shepps vs Phyllis David / Jane Gerlich2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJudith Hirsch / Audrey Prashker vs Karen Martini / Robin Gilenson6-2, 7-6
2023-07-19vs IGC, GreenburghLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Karen Healy vs Tami Haas / Deborah Weinstein4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Mulhern / Maud Tucker vs Alicia Cintron / Pamela Montgomery6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Moscou / Kathy Martin vs Hilary Plattus / Shirley Liu1-6, 0-6
2023-07-12vs Club Fit JV Solar FlaresLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Healy / Anne Young vs Ann Castelli / Patricia Sullivan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaud Tucker / Janice Shepps vs Thuy Tran-Quinn / Anita Reisdorf3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Prashker / Carol Troy vs Laura Buck / Catherine Traynor2-6, 3-6
2023-06-21vs WillowbrookWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Healy / Anne Young vs Gita Kinney / Frances Kellner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Maud Tucker vs Shang Guo / Anita Lohrs6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Martin / Catherine Mulhern vs Marjorie Marianacci / Karen Parish6-3, 6-2
2023-06-15vs Chestnut Ridge Hot ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Young / Karen Healy vs Laurie Anderson / Patricia Robbins6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Shepps / Maud Tucker vs Regina Allegretti-Davenport / Lisa Pieroni6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ringstad / Judith Hirsch vs Elke Betley / Susan Halper6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-31vs Sportime Lake Isle: Wise AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaud Tucker / Anne Young vs Birgit Landgrebe / Moira Lillis2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Shepps / Catherine Mulhern vs Janet George / Mary Mooney6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Moscou / Jennifer Ringstad vs Lisa Sperandio / Nancy Kaplan7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Karen Healy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Catherine Mulhern
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.50
Anne Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Janice Shepps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Judith Hirsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Audrey Prashker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Carol Troy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Ringstad
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kathy Martin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maud Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Moscou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Hirsch + Catherine Mulhern5250% games+1.3% vs expected
Janice Shepps + Catherine Mulhern201351% games−3.0% vs expected
Maud Tucker + Anne Young8846% gamesnot enough data
Anne Young + Jennifer Ringstad7652% gamesnot enough data
Maud Tucker + Catherine Mulhern4646% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Ringstad + Catherine Mulhern3644% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Martin + Susan Moscou2537% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Martin + Catherine Mulhern3449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Healy
65W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Catherine Mulhern
65W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Anne Young
24W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Janice Shepps
43W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
Judith Hirsch
13W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.27
2.5
Audrey Prashker
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Carol Troy
7W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.15
Jennifer Ringstad
22W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Martin
21W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maud Tucker
18W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Moscou
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.