Teams

Smart Aces

2026 UTA 2.5 Summer · 2.5M PM

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-20Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrent Higgs / Zac Bergman vs Luis Moreno / Sam Flitton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Fordham / Lorenzo Lucas vs Dustin Tate / Peter Wehrly5-7, 1-6
2026-07-09vs ContendersLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Schaefer / Zac Bergman vs Alfred Balch / Chris Guerrero2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Fordham / Lorenzo Lucas vs Timothy Jeffryes / Glenn Bailey4-6, 2-6
2026-07-06vs Cottonwood Club-CarterLost 02
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Lucas / Zac Bergman vs Brandon Carter / Dustin Tate5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrent Higgs / Oli Maizo vs Luis Moreno / Peter Wehrly2-6, 0-6
2026-06-25vs ContendersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Schaefer / Lorenzo Lucas vs Tate Olaveson / John Blanck4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Fordham / Zac Bergman vs Timothy Jeffryes / Glenn Bailey2-6, 3-6
2026-06-23Lost 02
L#1 DoublesOli Maizo / Brent Higgs vs Eugene Lee / Dustin Tate2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesZac Bergman / Michael Fordham vs Robert Clark / Charlie Morris3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5M PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Brent Higgs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Scott Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Michael Fordham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Lorenzo Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.96
Zac Bergman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Higgs + Scott Schaefer033 matchesnot enough data
Brent Higgs + Lorenzo Lucas123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Fordham + Lorenzo Lucas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Brent Higgs
31W–116L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
Scott Schaefer
14W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Michael Fordham
20W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Lorenzo Lucas
11W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Zac Bergman
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.