Teams

River Birch Duck-Rabbit Magic

2024 Coastal Plains MIXED 18 & Over · 3.5 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-16vs GR-Taylor (18s 3.5 MX)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Casteen / Corinne Haywood vs Abbey Strickland / Banks Nimmo6-2, 6-2
2024-07-09vs BW - SurlesLost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Matthew Casteen vs Andy Varnell / Katelyn Varnell4-6, 0-6
2024-07-02vs GR-Taylor (18s 3.5 MX)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Casteen / Corinne Haywood vs Kascia Henderson / Tucker Williams2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-02vs GR-Taylor (18s 3.5 MX)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casteen / Corinne Haywood vs Lauren Turbeville / Spencer Dail2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Monica Carlson
published
3.49
Corinne Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Diane Pons
published 3.5
3.35
Matthew Casteen
published
James McDonald
published 3.5
3.24
3.23
Glenn Crawley
published 3.5
3.20
Azita Movahed
published 3.5
3.16
Rafael Souza
published
3.08
Thomas Albanese
published
James Vislocky
published 3
Justin Freund
published
Maryann Cuellar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Veluci-Marlow + Glenn Crawley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Carlson
82W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Diane Pons
43W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Matthew Casteen
35W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
James McDonald
5W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roberta Veluci-Marlow
51W–46L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Glenn Crawley
17W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Azita Movahed
31W–36L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Rafael Souza
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Thomas Albanese
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
James Vislocky
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Justin Freund
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maryann Cuellar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.