Teams

Brookfield CC (Kay Moody)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

17 players · average NTRP 3.92 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-14vs Bridgemill (Malory Bateman)*Lost 14
W#1 DoublesAlice McQuade / Amy Strahan vs Kristi Cobb / Heidi Hill6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Anderson vs Maria Mora0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKay Moody / Tamara Watkins vs Laura McDonald / Cecily Rich4-6, 7-5, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Blyth / Tara Fust vs Jean Landmesser / Elizabeth Lyen4-6, 6-3, 2-6
L#4 DoublesJulie Hubbard / Gail Parks vs Teresa Keel / Lynne Poirier6-4, 2-6, 5-7
2024-12-07vs Cherokee TC (Katie Warechowski)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesKay Moody / Tamara Watkins vs Jodi Hendrixson / Martha Heneghan6-2, 1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelsey Moody vs Stephanie Miller4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTara Fust / Julie Hubbard vs Kate Kelava / Heather Dinsmore6-7, 7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRene Beavers / Jean Kahn vs Lauren Cannon / Lorin McIntyre2-6, 6-4, 2-6
W#4 DoublesAmy Strahan / Christina Anderson vs Ana McWethy / Jessica Olexa6-4, 3-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Gallagher
published 4.5
3.92
Kay Moody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Amy Strahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Alice McQuade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Shawn Dovale
published
3.75
Jackie Blyth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Allyson Campbell
published 4
3.75
Tamara Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Julie Hubbard
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Paula Hope
published
3.70
Kelsey Moody
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.62
Jean Kahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Tara Fust
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Rene Beavers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Gail Parks
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Christina Anderson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Debbie Turner
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Watkins + Kay Moody27962% games+5.0% vs expected
Alice McQuade + Kay Moody6256% games+2.0% vs expected
Julie Hubbard + Tara Fust6452% games−0.8% vs expected
Paula Hope + Jackie Blyth5452% games−1.7% vs expected
Tara Fust + Kay Moody2445% games−2.8% vs expected
Jean Kahn + Rene Beavers353253% games−4.7% vs expected
Tara Fust + Jackie Blyth3443% games−4.7% vs expected
Kay Moody + Paula Hope3450% games−10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Gallagher
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Moody
112W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Amy Strahan
27W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Alice McQuade
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Shawn Dovale
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Jackie Blyth
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Allyson Campbell
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Watkins
45W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Julie Hubbard
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Paula Hope
43W–43L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kelsey Moody
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jean Kahn
52W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Tara Fust
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Rene Beavers
43W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Gail Parks
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Christina Anderson
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Turner
16W–43L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.