Teams

MAC-Loza

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-18vs SAL-StembridgeWon 10
W#2 DoublesErich Yost / Madison Clapsaddle vs Kyle Fondren / Katie Fondren6-0, 6-1
2023-02-19vs MAC-McDonoughLost 01
L#1 DoublesErich Yost / Madison Clapsaddle vs Ariel Trimiew / RAVI KALKUNTE3-6, 4-6
2023-02-11vs ACAC-RalstonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadison Clapsaddle / Erich Yost vs John Carlton / Gabriela Vazquez6-3, 5-4
2023-01-28vs WW-LemcoWon 10
W#1 DoublesErich Yost / Madison Clapsaddle vs Christopher Carlin / Meghan Dexter6-1, 6-1
2023-01-14vs BURK-SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMadison Clapsaddle / Erich Yost vs Teresa Landes-Shuler / John O'Kane6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Juan Loza
published
3.44
Madison Clapsaddle
published
3.43
Erich Yost
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 3.5
3.22
Timea Harisova
published
3.13
Colton Johnson
published 3.5
3.10
Jason Yost
published
2.93
Lisa Yost
published
2.87
Ariel Mejia
published 3
2.66
Susanna Dodd
published
2.57
John Rogers
published
2.50
Maria Gault
published
Kaitlyn Mejia
published
Karin Meissner
published
Ralph Novak
published
Zach Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Rogers + Maria Gault033 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlyn Mejia + Ariel Mejia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Loza
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Madison Clapsaddle
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Erich Yost
140W–68L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Timea Harisova
33W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Colton Johnson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jason Yost
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Lisa Yost
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ariel Mejia
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Susanna Dodd
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
John Rogers
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57
Maria Gault
24W–25L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kaitlyn Mejia
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karin Meissner
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ralph Novak
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.