Teams

Surick

2025 40&Over Women · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-22vs Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Cheung / Sally Pillay vs Kimberly Derr / Toshka Damdin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHannah Finkelberg vs Megumi Smillie6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErika Bradley / Joanne Surick vs Yvonne Moore / Alexandra Miller Clark2-6, 4-6
2025-07-15vs Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesPatricia Travers / Sally Pillay vs Maria Vitale / Kimberly Derr6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Desalvo vs Lauren Wolff1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauran Tuck / Erica Mulder vs Susan Lee / Allison Oishi4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoanne Surick / Andrea Cheung vs Laura Gawley / Cintia Shiro3-6, 5-7
2025-07-08vs Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesSally Pillay / Erika Bradley vs JUHEE LEE / Michelle Kang3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCecilia Sienra vs Erin Murphy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Desalvo / Angela Cuciniello vs Laura Gawley / Yvonne Moore1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSally Song / Risa Starr vs Christine Hegan / Daniela Dumitru-Buna4-6, 2-6
2025-07-01vs Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesSally Pillay / Patricia Travers vs Wendy Boiardi / Susan Lee6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAndrea Cheung vs Alexandra Miller Clark6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanne Surick / Jennifer Desalvo vs Cintia Shiro / Saori Shiokawa1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRisa Starr / Sally Song vs Christine Hegan / Daniela Dumitru-Buna6-2, 6-4
2025-06-24vs Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllison Liss / Erika Bradley vs Wendy Boiardi / Megumi Smillie4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLauran Tuck vs Erin Murphy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSally Pillay / Patricia Travers vs Saori Shiokawa / Yuko Nishimura4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRisa Starr / Sally Song vs Allison Oishi / Toshka Damdin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-17vs Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesSally Pillay / Allison Liss vs Kimberly Derr / Maria Vitale5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Cheung vs Lauren Wolff6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanne Surick / Cecilia Sienra vs Wendy Boiardi / Megumi Smillie1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesErika Bradley / Patricia Travers vs Cintia Shiro / Yuko Nishimura4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Smillie/40&Over4.0W0621310155
2Surick0632143267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Hannah Finkelberg
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.88
Risa Starr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Andrea Cheung
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Allison Liss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Erica Mulder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Lauran Tuck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.63
Sally Pillay
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.61
Jennifer Desalvo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Joanne Surick
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Angela Cuciniello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Cecilia Sienra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Erika Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Travers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Song
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Travers + Sally Pillay044 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Surick + Lauran Tuck224 matchesnot enough data
Sally Song + Risa Starr123 matchesnot enough data
Risa Starr + Erica Mulder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Finkelberg
53W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Risa Starr
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Andrea Cheung
37W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Allison Liss
67W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Erica Mulder
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Lauran Tuck
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Sally Pillay
81W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jennifer Desalvo
9W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Joanne Surick
29W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Angela Cuciniello
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cecilia Sienra
54W–50L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Erika Bradley
11W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Travers
22W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Song
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.