Teams

MGriffin (Queens)

2024 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-11vs KEarly (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSandra To vs Meagan Davis6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMonica Erb vs Hoa Tran6-1, 6-1
2024-07-22vs KCantrell (Queens)Won 10
W#3 SinglesJessica Outterson vs Colleen Hickman5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-15vs ATaylor (Queens)Split 11
L#2 SinglesAdrianna Graves vs Cassandra Wincek2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMonica Erb vs Madeline Weih6-4, 6-3
2024-07-08vs KEarly (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSandra To vs Sophie Graham6-2, 6-0
2024-07-01vs KCantrell (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAdrianna Graves vs Morgan Scruggs6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMonica Erb vs Megan Hunter6-2, 6-3
2024-06-24vs ATaylor (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesSandra To vs Cassandra Wincek2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMonica Erb vs Sheila Walsh6-1, 7-5
2024-06-17vs KEarly (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAdrianna Graves vs Sophie Graham4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-10vs KCantrell (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAdrianna Graves vs Susan Sullivan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSandra To vs Morgan Scruggs3-6, 2-6
2024-06-03vs ATaylor (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMonica Erb vs Cassandra Wincek2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJessica Outterson vs Madeline Weih1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Monica Erb
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.90
Megan Griffin
published
3.86
Adrianna Graves
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.77
Sandra To
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.61
Mindy Merchant
published 4
3.59
Jessica Outterson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Coretta Wilson
published
Jenni Beasley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Erb + Megan Griffin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Monica Erb
98W–78L career · 7 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.20
Megan Griffin
24W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Adrianna Graves
40W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Sandra To
125W–127L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Mindy Merchant
18W–47L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jessica Outterson
68W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Coretta Wilson
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenni Beasley
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.