Teams

HOA/Crampton/65&Over8.0W

2022 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-05vs Claudia LagerstromLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Brookfield / Marcia Jacelone vs Linda Myres / Nancy Spielbusch0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarla Lovinggood / Cheryl Vaught vs Anne Hope / Nancy Manion6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Crampton / Judy Hodel vs Vivian Thomas / Leslie Stelzer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-22vs Claudia LagerstromWon 30
W#1 DoublesElaine Schulze / Gayle Osborne vs Anne Hope / Nancy Manion4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Lyla Flohrs vs Linda Myres / Sallie Brodhay6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Crampton / Becky Mehrmann vs Ann C / Nancy Spielbusch7-6, 4-2
2022-05-15vs Claudia LagerstromWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Brookfield / Gayle Osborne vs Muriel Hull / Hildegard McManus6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesElaine Schulze / Marsha Taylor vs Nancy Spielbusch / Ann C2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Crampton / Lyla Flohrs vs Sallie Brodhay / Linda Lee6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Crampton/65&Over8.0W2154976
2Claudia Lagerstrom12451286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Sarah Brookfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lyla Flohrs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Becky Mehrmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Gayle Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Marcia Jacelone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
MaryAnn Luchtel
published
3.18
Elaine Schulze
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Ann Crampton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Cheryl Vaught
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Judy Hodel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marla Lovinggood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marsha Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla Lovinggood + MaryAnn Luchtel6355% games+6.7% vs expected
MaryAnn Luchtel + Judy Hodel3544% games−0.6% vs expected
Marsha Taylor + Becky Mehrmann7353% games−0.9% vs expected
Elaine Schulze + Ann Crampton6355% games−2.3% vs expected
Becky Mehrmann + Lyla Flohrs7352% games−4.2% vs expected
Becky Mehrmann + Marcia Jacelone4446% games−4.9% vs expected
Marsha Taylor + Ann Crampton4646% games−5.7% vs expected
Becky Mehrmann + Ann Crampton4247% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Brookfield
30W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Lyla Flohrs
102W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Becky Mehrmann
118W–91L career · 1 line in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Gayle Osborne
75W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Marcia Jacelone
77W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
MaryAnn Luchtel
58W–74L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Elaine Schulze
58W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ann Crampton
67W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cheryl Vaught
29W–71L career · 1 line in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Judy Hodel
34W–43L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Marla Lovinggood
64W–97L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Marsha Taylor
60W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.