Teams

A40 3.0M PW Schulze

2022 NEOTA Adult 40 & Over · NEOTA A40&O 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-07-12vs A40 3.0M MV BeebeWon 31
W#1 DoublesRyan Kowalski / Mark Tabora vs Ravi Krishnan / Robert Haught6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Fechter vs Nicholas Fasola4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Smitek / Doug Michelsen vs Earl Beebe / David Frederick6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesOscar Avelar / John Schuld vs Michael Sreshta / Jeeho Chang6-0, 6-4
2022-06-14vs A40 3.0M PM SanchezWon 32
W#1 DoublesJohn Keller / Mark Tabora vs Brian Seitz / Max Steiner6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Fechter vs Roderick Yamat6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKevin Dieterich / Mark Smitek vs Jonathan Glazer / Ben Gilbert6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChris Daniels / Sean Schulze vs William Farr / Rob Skidmore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesDale Bilczo / Michael Reid vs Andrew Chan / Chad Wilson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A40&O 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Doug Michelsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Mark Tabora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Kevin Dieterich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Sean Schulze
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Fechter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Arindam Basu
published 3
2.73
Ryan Kowalski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Chris Daniels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dale Bilczo
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
John Keller
published
John Schuld
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Smitek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Reid
published
Oscar Avelar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Jurs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Michelsen + Sean Schulze5161% games+9.3% vs expected
David Fechter + Sean Schulze3248% games+5.2% vs expected
Mark Tabora + Doug Michelsen4453% games+3.6% vs expected
David Fechter + Kevin Dieterich4155% games+3.2% vs expected
Mark Tabora + Kevin Dieterich2347% games+0.4% vs expected
Doug Michelsen + Kevin Dieterich4261% gamesnot enough data
Mark Smitek + Doug Michelsen4160% gamesnot enough data
Mark Tabora + John Keller4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug Michelsen
83W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Mark Tabora
48W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Kevin Dieterich
36W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Sean Schulze
39W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
David Fechter
22W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Arindam Basu
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Ryan Kowalski
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Chris Daniels
25W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
Dale Bilczo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
John Keller
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Schuld
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mark Smitek
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Reid
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Oscar Avelar
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Jurs
4W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.