Teams

Taylor/FS/HO

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-11vs Wendlandt/Alma/CMLost 14
L#1 DoublesLaura Hood / Mischelle Roam vs Mel Schaefer / Claire Day4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNaomi Conley vs Alia Lyle6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Stovall / Tami Martin vs Jill Holmes / Deana Deramo2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKim Wohlford / Diane Sturgill vs Leigh Wendlandt / Melissa Hanna7-5, 6-1
L#4 DoublesJanice Taylor / C Aretha Lamar vs Laura King / Lisa Huckelbury5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-05vs Cunningham/FS/BGLost 14
L#1 DoublesC Aretha Lamar / Janice Taylor vs Melissa Chavez / Kelly Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNaomi Conley vs Sara Cunningham3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMischelle Roam / Dawn Stovall vs Cindy Koenigseder / Kim Newby4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBillie Nelligan / Melissa Wiederkehr vs Kara Cunningham / Kelly Thessing1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesDiane Sturgill / Kim Wohlford vs Barbara Daniel / Audrey Ostrander6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-21vs Cunningham/FS/BGLost 23
L#1 DoublesTami Martin / Dawn Stovall vs Kara Cunningham / Teresa Killough6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNaomi Conley vs Sara Cunningham2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBillie Nelligan / Melissa Wiederkehr vs Barbara Daniel / Cindy Koenigseder7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Sturgill / Kim Wohlford vs Audrey Ostrander / Lora Smith3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesLaura Hood / Mischelle Roam vs Kim Newby / Kelly Wilson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-15vs Cunningham/FS/BGWon 32
L#1 DoublesJanice Taylor / Laura Hood vs Kim Newby / Audrey Ostrander1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNaomi Conley vs Sara Cunningham1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKim Wohlford / Conni Ulmschneider vs Barbara Daniel / Melissa Chavez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Stovall / Tami Martin vs Kara Cunningham / Teresa Killough6-3, 7-6
W#4 DoublesMischelle Roam / Diane Sturgill vs Kelly Wilson / Cindy Koenigseder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-01vs Wendlandt/Alma/CMLost 23
L#1 DoublesKim Wohlford / C Aretha Lamar vs Leigh Wendlandt / Joanna Ayala3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Wiederkehr vs Alia Lyle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNaomi Conley / Billie Nelligan vs Melissa Hanna / Claire Day0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Stovall / Janice Taylor vs Laura King / Jill Holmes2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesLaura Hood / Mischelle Roam vs Deana Deramo / Sara Adair7-5, 6-4
2026-03-24vs Wendlandt/Alma/CMWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Hood / Janice Taylor vs Lisa Huckelbury / Deana Deramo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Stovall / Melissa Wiederkehr vs Jill Holmes / Laura King4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMischelle Roam / Tami Martin vs Leigh Wendlandt / Melissa Hanna4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#4 DoublesBillie Nelligan / Kim Wohlford vs Joanna Ayala / Lisa Parker7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cunningham/FS/BG5122819182
2Taylor/FS/HO24131741305

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Diane Sturgill
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Tami Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Kim Wohlford
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Laura Hood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.47
Naomi Conley
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Janice Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Billie Nelligan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.22
Melissa Wiederkehr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.22
Mischelle Roam
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
3.19
Dawn Stovall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.17
Conni Ulmschneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
C Aretha Lamar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Wohlford + Diane Sturgill6160% gamesnot enough data
Laura Hood + Mischelle Roam4157% gamesnot enough data
Janice Taylor + Laura Hood314 matchesnot enough data
C Aretha Lamar + Janice Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Kim Wohlford + Billie Nelligan303 matchesnot enough data
Tami Martin + Dawn Stovall123 matchesnot enough data
Billie Nelligan + Naomi Conley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Sturgill
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Tami Martin
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Kim Wohlford
15W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Laura Hood
11W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Naomi Conley
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Janice Taylor
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Billie Nelligan
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.24
Melissa Wiederkehr
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Mischelle Roam
13W–11L career · 16 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
4
Dawn Stovall
6W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.19
3.5
Conni Ulmschneider
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
C Aretha Lamar
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.