Teams

Armonk Dome

2026 18&Over Men Open · Men's Open

6 players · average NTRP 4.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesPedro Aiala / Mark Weller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-14vs Sportime Lake IsleLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Rifkin / Patrick Gonnelli vs Carlos Campo / John Cassas0-6, 2-6
2026-03-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Arnett / Mark Weller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-08vs TIA New RochelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Gonzalez / Artem Vasheshnikov vs Francisco Oliveira / Cesar Andrade6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSergi Fontcuberta I Coletes / Daniel Rifkin vs Juan Moncada / Lukas Michenka4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-11vs Sportime Lake IsleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesArtem Vasheshnikov / Nicholas Condos vs Ted Williams / Connor di Marco6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Weller / Daniel Rifkin vs Nikolay Sahakyan / Samrakshyak Bajracharya4-6, 4-6
2026-01-04vs New Rochelle Racquet ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrick Gonnelli / Pedro Aiala vs Lukas Dow / Jean-Benoit Belin4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesArtem Vasheshnikov vs Juan Pablo Herrera7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRoss Elfand / David Arnett vs Luke Nickerson / Flavio Carretero Garbati7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-09vs TIA New RochelleLost 01
L#2 DoublesGriffin Schlesinger / Patrick Gonnelli vs Aljosa Piric / Vlad Margalitadze4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's Open have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.13
Artem Vasheshnikov
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5.5
4.40
Daniel Rifkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Mark Weller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Patrick Gonnelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
David Arnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Ross Elfand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Gonnelli + Daniel Rifkin224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Weller + Daniel Rifkin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Artem Vasheshnikov
5W–1L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
5.13
4.5
Daniel Rifkin
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
4.40
Mark Weller
27W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Patrick Gonnelli
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
David Arnett
27W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Ross Elfand
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.