Teams

SFV LLW - Unmatchables - Jason Gorman

2023 Mixed 18+ SFV Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 9.0 MxD

10 players · average NTRP 4.69 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-02vs SFV BenchwarmersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Scott / Leticia Alcala vs Joshua Gurevich / Yuri Nichelson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEugene Shin / Kristina Chen vs Ashish Bangar / Felicity Flesher7-5, 6-2
2023-04-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Scott / Kristina Chen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNicholas de Goede / Cze-Ja Tam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-26vs SFV BenchwarmersWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas de Goede / Andrea Rivera vs Joshua Gurevich / Chandler Nguyen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-03-04vs SFV Love Love TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Jones / Mandi Collier vs Daniel Nolan / Chiaki Ishihara6-2, 6-0
2023-02-19vs SFV BenchwarmersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesZachary Jones / Mandi Collier vs Suren Khachatryan / Felicity Flesher6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJason Gorman / Leticia Alcala vs Andre Law / Heidi Schuler6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-11vs SFV BenchwarmersWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas de Goede / Canna Furuta vs Michael Marley / April Hartstein6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWilliam Knox / Leticia Alcala vs Ashish Bangar / Chandler Nguyen6-2, 6-4
2023-02-05vs SFV Love Love TennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Gorman / Kristina Chen vs Daniel Nolan / Chiaki Ishihara6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 9.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrea Rivera
published 5
4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.60
Leticia Alcala
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.33
Kristina Chen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Jason Gorman
published
4.16
Nicholas de Goede
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Cze-Ja Tam
published 4.5
4.13
Bill Willis
published 4.5
4.07
Adam Scott
published 4.5
Eugene Shin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrea Rivera
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.69
5
Leticia Alcala
160W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Kristina Chen
152W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
4.33
Jason Gorman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Nicholas de Goede
81W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Cze-Ja Tam
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Bill Willis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Adam Scott
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
Eugene Shin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.