Teams

LEDMONDSON

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-13vs JMurphySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer McFarling / Sarah Winstead vs Nancy Ross / Janet Murphy6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Christy van Ness vs Jane Stutzman / Krissy Caro5-7, 5-7
2022-10-06vs JMurphyWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Axberg / Carolyn Wieber vs Nancy Ross / Krissy Caro6-2, 6-3
2022-09-29vs JMurphyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Axberg / Sarah Winstead vs Dane Brackett / Michele Lee6-7, 5-7
2022-09-22vs JMurphyLost 01
L#1 DoublesShirley Chapman / Beth Shelly vs Dane Brackett / Michele Lee3-6, 3-6
2022-09-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer McFarling / Christy van Ness vs Janet Murphy / Nancy Ross6-1, 7-5
2022-09-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Axberg / Carolyn Wieber vs Janet Murphy / Nancy Ross2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-09-01vs JMurphyWon 20
W#1 DoublesShirley Chapman / Christy van Ness vs Dane Brackett / Michele Lee6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Winstead / Jennifer McFarling vs Terry Marcott / Marnie Stutts6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Shirley Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.58
Jennifer McFarling
published
2.50
Lea Edmondson
published
2.46
Sarah Winstead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Carolyn Wieber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Christy van Ness
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Corinne Alavi
published 2.5
Yvette DeSilva
published 2.5
Paula Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Winstead + Yvette DeSilva1637% gamesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Christy van Ness303 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Winstead + Carolyn Wieber033 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Wieber + Christy van Ness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shirley Chapman
139W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Jennifer McFarling
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
Lea Edmondson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.50
3
Sarah Winstead
41W–99L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
2.5
Carolyn Wieber
85W–108L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Christy van Ness
74W–119L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Corinne Alavi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Yvette DeSilva
34W–55L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paula Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.