Teams

HCC/Arias-Bruning

2026 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 5.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.42 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HCC/Arias-Bruning000000
2HCC TRI-AGAIN 5.0/Barkett000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Bec Bruning
published 5
4.95
Jordana Klein
published
4.80
Natalie Paiva
published
Aly Peterson
published 5
4.44
Marie Berghaus
published
4.37
KAREN HARKEY
published
4.33
Lilivette Arroyo
published 4.5
4.04
Shannon Griffin
published
4.00
3.92
Rebecca Evangelista
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Paiva + Lilivette Arroyo044 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Evangelista + Irene Arias Gutierrez314 matchesnot enough data
KAREN HARKEY + Lilivette Arroyo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bec Bruning
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.96
Jordana Klein
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.95
Natalie Paiva
22W–20L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Aly Peterson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marie Berghaus
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
4.44
KAREN HARKEY
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Lilivette Arroyo
50W–36L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
4.33
Shannon Griffin
27W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Camille Lastrapes
29W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.92
4
Irene Arias Gutierrez
65W–63L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.