Teams

Johnson-North Central

2026 Mixed 40 & Over-DLT · 3.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-15vs Team SykesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTabitha Arrington / James Ensell vs Nathan Price / Lindsey Sheffield6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPam Johnson / Edgar Contreras vs Latoya Sykes / Doyle Tubbs6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWENDY Vines / Matthew Sparks vs Raymond Emerson / Ashley Grubb4-6, 4-6
2026-07-13vs Team SykesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRollin Riggs / Ching Cushing-Murray vs Anne Shelley / James Shelley6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWENDY Vines / Matthew Sparks vs Raymond Emerson / Ashley Grubb3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJames Ensell / Tabitha Arrington vs Lindsey Sheffield / Nathan Price6-0, 6-0
2026-07-10vs Team SykesLost 12
L#1 DoublesTarshian Moon / Matthew Sparks vs Doyle Tubbs / Lindsey Sheffield1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Downs / Edgar Contreras vs Joshua Walker / Katie Boykin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeath Fullilove / Kathlene Poulelis vs Tyrone Lewis / Latoya Sykes6-3, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Team SykesWon 21
L#1 DoublesEdgar Contreras / Tammy Downs vs Joshua Walker / Katie Boykin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathlene Poulelis / Heath Fullilove vs Latoya Sykes / Tyrone Lewis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChing Cushing-Murray / Rollin Riggs vs Anne Shelley / James Shelley6-3, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Team SykesLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Johnson / Edgar Contreras vs Latoya Sykes / Doyle Tubbs4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Sparks / Tarshian Moon vs Lindsey Sheffield / Tyrone Lewis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Sykes328714130
2Johnson-North Central236918130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
James Ensell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Heath Fullilove
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Rollin Riggs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Edgar Contreras
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Kathlene Poulelis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Ching Cushing-Murray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Matthew Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Tabitha Arrington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Pam Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Tammy Downs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
WENDY Vines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

WENDY Vines + Rollin Riggs5256% games+16.7% vs expected
Kathlene Poulelis + Heath Fullilove7264% games+13.0% vs expected
Matthew Sparks + WENDY Vines033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Ensell
32W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Heath Fullilove
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Rollin Riggs
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Edgar Contreras
21W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kathlene Poulelis
37W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Ching Cushing-Murray
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Matthew Sparks
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Tabitha Arrington
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Pam Johnson
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Tammy Downs
27W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
WENDY Vines
29W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.