Teams

SAL-Newman

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-05vs WO-BlackwoodLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Colberg / David Spiller vs Lucia O'Connell / Stephen Mathews5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-26vs BURK-ClarkLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Colberg / Brian Consolvo vs Modestine Carter / Kevin Carter7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-01-30vs HERM-HardestyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Spiller / Elizabeth Newman vs Teki Hall / John Gardner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-15vs WW-ConnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Spiller / Heather Colberg vs Matthew Boys / Jessica van Tuyle1-6, 3-6
2022-01-09vs CCV-AveryWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Newman / Brian Consolvo vs Rick Morris / Suzanne Morris6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Megan Shrestha
published
3.60
Kendall Consolvo
published
3.57
Elizabeth Newman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Heather Colberg
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.40
Mandy Tornabene
published
3.28
Brian Consolvo
published 3.5
Gaurav Shrestha
published 3.5
3.16
David Dwyer
published 3.5
3.14
Virginia Totaro
published
3.10
Gregory Moore
published 3.5
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.05
David Spiller
published 3
Lauren Cecil
published
Scott Broaddus
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Shrestha
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Kendall Consolvo
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Elizabeth Newman
115W–92L career · 10 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Heather Colberg
114W–88L career · 9 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
Mandy Tornabene
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Brian Consolvo
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Gaurav Shrestha
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
David Dwyer
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
Virginia Totaro
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gregory Moore
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
David Spiller
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Lauren Cecil
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Broaddus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.