Teams

Whittenberger - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-05vs Escambia/Wallace/55&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Smith / Emily Hillman vs Jerry Clark / Elizabeth Elliott5-7, 4-6
2024-09-28vs Hyde-White - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Smith / Emily Hillman vs John Whitehead / Sue Nast6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gordon Paulus
published 4
3.74
Michael Yager
published
3.63
Emily Hillman
published 4
3.39
Marion Elsas
published
3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
3.34
John Whittenberger
published
3.31
Bonnie Bucco
published 3.5
3.22
Andrew Hillman
published 3.5
3.04
Kaye Whittenberger
published
2.95
Klara Szalai
published
2.92
Theresa Smith
published
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gordon Paulus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Emily Hillman
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
Marion Elsas
19W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Andrew Hillman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
Kaye Whittenberger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
Klara Szalai
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Theresa Smith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.92
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.