Teams

Colts Neck

2021 18&Over Men · 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-21vs BTHSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDaniel Dumpel / Andrew Hoffman vs Chris Moran / Serban Satruc6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTom Zita / Pavel Baresh vs Hector Molina-Samalot / Kiril Gerin5-7, 5-7
2021-07-14vs BTHWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hoffman / Daniel Dumpel vs Raymond Matthieu Postadan / Patrick Liu6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Zita / Pavel Baresh vs Aminur Rusul / Kiril Gerin6-1, 6-2
2021-07-07vs BTHLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hoffman / Daniel Dumpel vs Serban Satruc / Chris Moran4-4
L#2 SinglesRyan Hefter vs Mitchell Bregman5-6
L#3 DoublesScott Prakken / Dennis Fernandes vs Raymond Matthieu Postadan / Don Kim1-6, 0-1
2021-06-30vs BTHLost 02
L#2 DoublesAndrew Hoffman / Daniel Dumpel vs Andrew Rosenbloom / Ryan Ritchey4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDennis Fernandes / Ryan Hefter vs Serban Satruc / Clark Herman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs BTHWon 20
W#2 DoublesAndrew Hoffman / Daniel Dumpel vs Ryan Ritchey / Patrick Smith6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChuck Chelednik / Ryan Hefter vs Eric Hornstein / Chris Moran1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-16vs BTHLost 03
L#1 DoublesDennis Barlotta / Daniel Dumpel vs Clark Herman / Eric Frankovic6-7, 6-5
L#2 DoublesAndrew Hoffman / Pavel Baresh vs Serban Satruc / Chris Moran3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDennis Fernandes / Paul Jaslar vs Kiril Gerin / Andrew Rosenbloom2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTH42181227243
2Colts Neck24121838275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dennis Barlotta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Andrew Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Dennis Fernandes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Pavel Baresh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Hefter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Scott Prakken
published
Tom Zita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Will Potter
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dennis Barlotta
41W–21L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Andrew Hoffman
72W–36L career · 6 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Dennis Fernandes
27W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
Pavel Baresh
39W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Ryan Hefter
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Prakken
17W–20L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tom Zita
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Will Potter
11W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.