Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Simmons & Barnes

2021 SCTA Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-12-05vs CV-Shadow Mountain/S DentonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarti Jablon / Kanjamat Mullally vs Suzette Willetts / Barbara Wood3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHolly Simmons / Karen Stern vs Megan Bigbee / Andrea Howland - Cobb4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-11-28vs CV-Andalusia CC/KilburnSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlethea Platis / Kanjamat Mullally vs Debra Creem / COLLEEN Jarrar3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLindy Odland / Karen Stern vs Veronica Tancredi Morgan / Suzanne Roth6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKanjamat Mullally / Alethea Platis vs Kelly Davis / Celeste Manolas6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Stern / Karin Barnes vs Ailee Robertson / Nadine Kim6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-11-14vs CV-Palm Desert Resort/Hiya-AmpaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Marcotte Solimano / Kanjamat Mullally vs Zayda Hiya-Ampao / Lori Tanking6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Karen Marcotte Solimano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kanjamat Mullally
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Marti Jablon
published
Alethea Platis
published 3.5
Holly Simmons
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Maher
published 3.5
3.08
Jennifer Ruddell
published
Karen Stern
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Tammy Roach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kanjamat Mullally + Karen Marcotte Solimano7072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Marcotte Solimano
74W–60L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Kanjamat Mullally
50W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
Marti Jablon
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Alethea Platis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Holly Simmons
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Maher
19W–10L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Ruddell
17W–27L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
0
Karen Stern
60W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tammy Roach
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.