Teams

MO/Wassam/18&Over3.5W

2026 Adult 18 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-17vs Tricia DenzerWon 41
W#1 DoublesNatalie Hampsten / Debby Hunter vs Lois Dresslaer / Diane Musick7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHanna Wood vs Tammy Nguyen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKortney Wassam / Emmilyn Murphy vs Tawny Denzer / Kimberly Darrah6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAva Billue vs Elena Gable3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Feller / Deb Jochems vs Marsha Marsh / Carolyn Hanger6-3, 6-0
2026-06-10vs Tricia DenzerWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Feller / Stephanie Wachob vs Lois Dresslaer / Diane Musick6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNatalie Hampsten vs Madelynn Jared4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDebby Hunter / Debbie Pell vs Abigail Chastain / Marsha Marsh3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHanna Wood vs Tawny Denzer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmmilyn Murphy / Ava Billue vs Tijuana Julian / Carolyn Hanger6-2, 6-3
2026-06-03vs Tricia DenzerWon 32
L#1 DoublesNatalie Hampsten / Hanna Wood vs Diane Musick / Elena Gable5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKortney Wassam vs Madelynn Jared6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebby Hunter / Emmilyn Murphy vs Tawny Denzer / Marsha Marsh6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesStephanie Wachob vs Abigail Chastain6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeb Jochems / Sandra Sanders vs Tammy Nguyen / Tijuana Julian6-1, 6-2
2026-05-27vs Tricia DenzerWon 41
W#1 DoublesJennifer Feller / Stephanie Wachob vs Carolyn Hanger / Abigail Chastain6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEmmilyn Murphy vs Madelynn Jared3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Pell / Sandra Sanders vs Lois Dresslaer / Tijuana Julian7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHanna Wood vs Tammy Nguyen6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKortney Wassam / Deb Jochems vs Tawny Denzer / Elena Gable7-5, 6-0
2026-05-20vs Tricia DenzerWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Feller / Stephanie Wachob vs Kimberly Darrah / Diane Musick6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKortney Wassam vs Elena Gable6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebbie Pell / Sandra Sanders vs Lois Dresslaer / Vicki Brinck6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHanna Wood / Emmilyn Murphy vs Tawny Denzer / Gordana Lazic6-4, 6-4
2026-05-13vs Tricia DenzerWon 41
L#1 DoublesKortney Wassam / Stephanie Wachob vs Diane Musick / Lois Dresslaer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHanna Wood vs Madelynn Jared6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmmilyn Murphy / Natalie Hampsten vs Tawny Denzer / Gordana Lazic6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Feller vs Tammy Nguyen6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie Pell / Debby Hunter vs Kimberly Darrah / Tricia Denzer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs Tricia DenzerWon 32
W#1 DoublesDebbie Pell / Jennifer Feller vs Marsha Marsh / Carolyn Hanger6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKortney Wassam vs Elena Gable6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDeb Jochems / Debby Hunter vs Diane Musick / Lois Dresslaer4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesLauren Hustead vs Gordana Lazic6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHanna Wood / Natalie Hampsten vs Vicki Brinck / Abigail Chastain6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO/Wassam/18&Over3.5W7026923246
2Tricia Denzer0792657384

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jennifer Feller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Kortney Wassam
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.42
Hanna Wood
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.32
Stephanie Wachob
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.31
Sandra Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Natalie Hampsten
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Ava Billue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Emmilyn Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Debby Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Debbie Pell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Deb Jochems
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lauren Hustead
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Feller + Stephanie Wachob3261% games+10.9% vs expected
Kortney Wassam + Deb Jochems1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Feller
25W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Kortney Wassam
41W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Hanna Wood
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Stephanie Wachob
55W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Sandra Sanders
49W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Natalie Hampsten
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ava Billue
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Emmilyn Murphy
24W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Debby Hunter
14W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Debbie Pell
101W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Deb Jochems
50W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Lauren Hustead
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.